Skip to main content

Security report for sertifikatai.lt

Interneto vizija, UAB · Technology · Lithuania

High risk. 3 critical or high findings in Network security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sertifikatai.lt is a Lithuanian website operated by the company Interneto vizija, UAB, specializing in SSL certificates and data security solutions. The site targets businesses and website owners in Lithuania seeking to secure their online presence with SSL certificates, emphasizing trust and data protection. The business model is primarily e-commerce and service provision focused on security products. The website presents professional content with good branding consistency and trust indicators such as HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sertifikatai.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
59
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a local Lithuanian provider of SSL certificates, catering to a niche market focused on website security. The use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools indicates an active approach to customer engagement and marketing. However, the absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies on the site may limit transparency. The business appears small-sized with a focused technology sector presence. Partnerships with known service providers like Cookiebot and Intercom support its marketing and customer interaction capabilities.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR principles, indicating a baseline security and privacy posture. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of explicit privacy and security policies represent gaps. The extensive use of third-party trackers and marketing tools increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency and legitimacy verification.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and security policies to enhance transparency and compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  5. Regularly audit and minimize third-party trackers to reduce privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Interneto vizija, UAB
Description
Klientai labiau pasitiki svetainėmis su SSL sertifikatais - duomenų saugumo garantu, būtinu visur, kur naudojami asmeniniai klientų duomenys.
Key services
SSL certificates, Data security solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Sales Manago, Cloudflare
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Reddit, YouTube
Marketing tools
Intercom, Sales Manago
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or invalid for the domain, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categorization and descriptions.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. No direct contact information such as emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Multiple third-party services and trackers are used, including Google Analytics, Hotjar, Intercom, Sales Manago, and Reddit.
  7. Website uses HTTPS and has a favicon and Open Graph metadata for social sharing.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. Business information is present in meta tags and author metadata indicating 'Interneto vizija, UAB'.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with integration of Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but could improve accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting and CMS details are not explicitly detectable. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics, marketing, and content delivery, which should be monitored for privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sertifikatai.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sertifikatai.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.