Skip to main content

Security report for sentinel.com

Sentinel Technologies Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sentinel Technologies Inc. is a well-established IT services and solutions provider specializing in cybersecurity, cloud computing, managed services, and lifecycle management. The company offers a broad portfolio of services including AnyCloud solutions, optimized business operations, security solutions, subscription and as-a-service offerings, and AI-driven technologies. Their market position is reinforced by partnerships with major technology vendors such as Cisco, Microsoft, AWS, and VMware, and recognition through industry awards. The website content is professionally presented, targeting organizations seeking comprehensive IT and security solutions. Technically, the website is built on the Sitefinity CMS platform and employs modern web technologies including Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and accessible, with good SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, although some security headers could be more explicitly implemented. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy present but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices but lacks publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, suggesting the domain may be newly registered or unverified, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. However, the professional nature of the site and its active digital presence mitigate some of these concerns. Overall, Sentinel Technologies presents a credible and professional front with strong technical and security foundations. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and domain registration transparency would enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 28 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sentinel.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sentinel Technologies operates in the competitive IT services sector, focusing on cybersecurity and cloud solutions. Their business model revolves around delivering managed services, consulting, and subscription-based offerings tailored to enterprise clients. The company leverages strategic partnerships with leading technology vendors to enhance service delivery and credibility. Their target customers are medium to large organizations requiring robust IT infrastructure and security. The company demonstrates growth through active content marketing, events, and workshops. The partnership ecosystem includes top-tier technology providers, reinforcing their market position. Sentinel’s operations indicate a mature business with a focus on innovation, customer service, and industry recognition.

Security posture

Sentinel Technologies exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. The site does not expose sensitive data and employs input validation on forms. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not visible in the HTML and should be verified server-side. There is no publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which is a gap in transparency. Privacy compliance is partially addressed but lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which is important for GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be improved with enhanced transparency and additional headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and visibly document a comprehensive cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Verify and publicly display security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to ensure domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by appointing or disclosing a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sentinel Technologies Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sentinel Technologies Inc.
Description
Sentinel Technologies proudly presents Fortis: a comprehensive portfolio of security services and solutions designed to proactively protect every aspect of your digital and physical environment. Our goal is to ensure your organization has the most effective tools to defend its systems, data, and users against an ever-evolving threat landscape.
Key services
AnyCloud Solutions, Optimized Business Operations, Security Solutions, Subscription and AAS, Sentinel Managed Services, Lifecycle Solutions, Artificial Intelligence, Workshops, Assessments, Consulting Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js, Sitefinity CMS, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
Sitefinity CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form inputs with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Professional design with clear navigation and mobile optimization.
  3. Strong presence of security best practices including HTTPS and CAPTCHA on forms.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  5. No explicit privacy cookie banner or terms of service page detected.
  6. Multiple trusted technology partners and certifications mentioned.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers and physical address.
  8. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS platform (Sitefinity) with a clean, responsive design optimized for mobile devices. It uses contemporary JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and integrates Google services for analytics and bot protection. The site loads quickly and has well-structured metadata and Open Graph tags for SEO and social sharing. The technical implementation follows best practices for accessibility and user experience. However, some security headers are not explicitly visible and should be confirmed at the server level. The absence of WHOIS data is a technical anomaly that should be addressed to avoid trust issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sentinel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sentinel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.