Skip to main content

Security report for sensavis.com

Sensavis AB · Education · Sweden

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sensavis AB operates a specialized educational technology platform focused on visual learning tools that simplify complex subjects through interactive and personalized video content. The company targets educational institutions including schools and districts, offering license-based software solutions for Apple iOS and Windows platforms. Their market position is that of a niche edtech provider with a clear focus on enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes through innovative digital tools. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and a consent management platform ensuring GDPR compliance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though some security headers are not explicitly confirmed. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, reCAPTCHA integration, and consent-based tracking, but could be improved by publishing explicit security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting a positive user experience and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sensavis.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sensavis AB's business model revolves around licensing their visual learning software to educational institutions, offering individual, school, and district licenses. Their revenue streams likely include software sales and training services. The company maintains an active online presence with social media channels and newsletter subscriptions, indicating engagement with their target audience of educators and students. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major analytics and advertising platforms, enhancing marketing reach. The website content and structure reflect a focused strategy on education technology, with clear calls to action for product trials and quote requests. Growth indicators include regular news updates and webinar offerings. The company appears to operate independently without disclosed parent or subsidiary relationships.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and integration of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse. The use of a consent management platform demonstrates commitment to GDPR compliance and user privacy. Tracking pixels from Facebook, LinkedIn, and Kochava are managed with user consent, reducing privacy risks. However, the absence of explicit security policy pages and incident response contact information represents a compliance gap. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security are not explicitly detected, suggesting room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving HTTP header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and enhance trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance website accessibility compliance to improve inclusivity and meet regulatory standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sensavis AB
Description
Sensavis provides a visual learning tool designed to make complex subjects easier to understand through personalized educational videos and interactive learning experiences.
Key services
Visual Learning Tool software, Personalized education video creation, Training and certification, Support services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.10, jQuery 3.6.0, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Kochava Web SDK, Contact Form 7, reCAPTCHA v3, ShareThis CMP
Frameworks
Bootstrap (navbar classes suggest usage)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URLs use https)
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Consent management platform for GDPR compliance
  • Tracking pixels managed with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Kochava
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Kochava
Marketing tools
ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational technology site offering a visual learning tool
  2. Strong GDPR compliance with a consent management platform and privacy policy
  3. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts integrated with consent mechanisms
  4. No visible security or content blocking issues
  5. Contact information is available primarily via contact form and email
  6. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
  7. Good use of modern web technologies and responsive design
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.9.10, leveraging jQuery 3.6.0 and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Kochava SDK, all managed via a ShareThis consent management platform. The site uses Contact Form 7 with Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and CDN usage for fonts and analytics. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and alternate language links. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting a good user experience and compliance posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sensavis.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sensavis.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.