Skip to main content

Security report for selproviders.org

SEL Providers Association · Education · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The SEL Providers Association operates a professional website built on the Wix platform, serving as a non-profit organization focused on advancing social-emotional learning (SEL) through networking, shared learning, promotion, and advocacy. The website presents a clear business description and targets SEL providers and educational stakeholders. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies provided by Wix, including JavaScript frameworks and polyfills, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and some security hardening scripts, though explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy are not evident. Privacy compliance is lacking as no privacy or cookie policies are found, and no consent mechanisms are implemented. Contact information is limited to a physical address with no emails or phone numbers visible. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching selproviders.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a niche non-profit association within the education sector, specifically targeting SEL providers. Its business model revolves around community building, advocacy, and collective promotion rather than commercial sales. The website content and structured data reinforce this positioning. The absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies suggests a small organizational size with limited digital maturity in compliance areas. The use of Wix indicates a cost-effective approach to web presence. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The association's market presence appears focused and specialized, with trust signals such as structured data and HTTPS in place.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and scripts are in place to harden fetch and XMLHttpRequest operations, indicating awareness of security best practices. However, the lack of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and absence of a security.txt file or incident response contacts reveal gaps in comprehensive security management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not appear to collect sensitive user data via forms, reducing risk exposure. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not evident, which could be a concern for European visitors. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-commercial informational site but should be improved for enhanced trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Implement explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy to mitigate cross-site scripting and other attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Include verified contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SEL Providers Association
Description
The SEL Providers Association aims to advance high-quality SEL implementation by bringing together SEL providers for networking, shared learning, collective promotion, and advocacy.
Key services
Networking, Shared learning, Collective promotion, Advocacy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, Webpack, Core-js polyfills, Focus-within polyfill
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security override scripts to harden fetch and XHR

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix technologies
  2. No WHOIS data available due to privacy or malformed response
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected
  4. Contact information limited to physical address in structured data
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in content
  6. No social media links detected in HTML
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML content
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  9. Good use of structured data for SEO and business info
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using Wix Thunderbolt framework and standard web technologies including JavaScript, Webpack, and polyfills for browser compatibility. The site loads resources from Wix's CDN infrastructure, ensuring reasonable performance and availability. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and viewport settings. SEO is basic but supported by structured data in JSON-LD format for business and website information. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site lacks custom server-side security headers and advanced performance optimizations but is sufficient for its informational purpose. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated by adding security headers and improving privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with selproviders.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review selproviders.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.