Skip to main content

Security report for self.ee

SELF II · Education · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SELF II is an established Estonian training and development company operating since 1989, specializing in practical, activity-based training, consulting, and coaching services aimed at individuals, teams, and organizations. The company offers a broad range of services including leadership development, personnel consulting, and change management support. Their market position is that of a trusted, small-sized education provider with a long-standing presence in Estonia. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, hosted by Zone Media OÜ, and employs modern web technologies with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though the site lacks published security policies and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching self.ee

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the education and consulting sector, focusing on personal and organizational development. Their business model is service-oriented, delivering training programs, coaching, and consulting primarily in Estonia. The website content and structure indicate a mature business with a clear focus on practical development solutions. The presence of social media links and structured data enhances their digital footprint. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests an area for compliance improvement. No suspicious or risky business practices are evident. The company appears to maintain a stable and credible market presence with potential for growth through digital enhancements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implied, enhancing form security. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are presented. The site does not appear to be protected by a WAF or advanced security services, which may expose it to certain risks. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and transparency in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy including GDPR compliance details and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Develop and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear data retention policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SELF II
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SELF II
Description
SELF II on 1989. aastast tegutsev koolitus- ja arendusfirma, mis tegeleb peamiselt muudatuste konsulteerimise ning muudatustega seotud EQ-alaste väljakutsete toetamisega koolituste ja konsultatsioonide abil. Lisaks viib läbi koolituskursusi ja osutab personalitöö, juhtimise ja juhendamise alaseid konsultatsiooniteenuseid.
Key services
Training courses, Consultations, Coaching, Development programs, Feedback surveys, Personnel and leadership consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 (implied by recaptcha_v3 field in form CSS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Estonian language.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, address, and contact form.
  5. Use of modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins.
  6. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. No security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information is published.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well aged.
  9. Social media presence includes Facebook and LinkedIn.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It uses jQuery and Google Analytics for functionality and tracking. The hosting is provided by Zone Media OÜ, an Estonian hosting provider, as indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. The site could improve by implementing additional security headers and privacy compliance features. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization in privacy and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with self.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review self.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.