Skip to main content

Security report for seiler-ds.com

Seiler Design Solutions · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Seiler Design Solutions is a technology-focused company specializing in providing unbiased and informative solutions related to Autodesk software. The company targets clients who use Autodesk products, offering services such as software sales, consulting, training, and support. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by a moderate-sized business presence primarily in the United States. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses modern plugins and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Stripe for payment processing. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, although some privacy compliance elements like explicit privacy and cookie policies are not detected in the provided content. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled, but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and conducting regular vulnerability assessments. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain may not be registered, which is inconsistent with the active website presence and should be investigated further. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and WHOIS data clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seiler-ds.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on Autodesk software solutions. Its business model revolves around providing software, consulting, and training services to clients, likely including architects, engineers, and designers. The presence of social media channels and structured data indicates an established digital footprint. The company appears to be medium-sized with a regional focus in the US. The lack of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which is a critical point for business credibility. The website's use of WooCommerce suggests some e-commerce capabilities, possibly for software sales or training registrations. Marketing automation and analytics tools indicate a data-driven approach to customer engagement. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. It employs common security best practices such as asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the content. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional controls and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data or domain registration status to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Seiler Design Solutions
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Seiler Design Solutions
Description
Seiler Design Solutions provides informative, unbiased solutions to clients that Autodesk software.
Key services
Autodesk software sales, Consulting, Training, Support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Stripe, Events Manager plugin, Slider Revolution
Frameworks
Avada WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with async loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain not registered, inconsistent with website presence
  3. Professional business website focused on Autodesk software solutions
  4. Uses modern WordPress CMS with common plugins and tracking tools
  5. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found in provided content
  6. Contact information includes phone numbers and physical address in St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn
  8. No security policy or incident response information found
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  10. No data protection officer contact found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme and WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It integrates several plugins including Events Manager and Slider Revolution, and uses jQuery and Stripe for payment processing. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are implemented for tracking and marketing analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design principles. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading improving page load times. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format, enhancing search engine visibility. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seiler-ds.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seiler-ds.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.