Skip to main content

Security report for seekube.com

Seekube · Technology · France

Partial score · DNS & email only

73/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Seekube is a French-based technology platform specializing in event organization and facilitation, primarily targeting professional networking and recruitment events. The website presents a modern and professional interface built with React and Tailwind CSS, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies suggests gaps in compliance and transparency. Security posture is limited due to missing security headers and lack of visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website's business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seekube.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
73
Average
73

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Seekube operates in the event technology sector, focusing on connecting companies and candidates through organized events. The platform likely generates revenue through event hosting services and possibly recruitment facilitation. The target audience includes professionals, recruiters, and students in France. The business model centers on providing a digital venue for networking and recruitment events, positioning Seekube as a niche player in the French market. The company maintains consistent branding and a professional web presence but lacks visible trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture with HTTPS presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed in the HTML snippet) but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or incident response contacts was found, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also raises compliance concerns under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly disclose comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers to HTTP responses to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update the website to address any identified vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Seekube
Description
Seekube is a platform focused on organizing and facilitating events, likely targeting professional networking, recruitment, or similar event-based interactions.
Key services
Event hosting, Networking facilitation, Recruitment events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Typekit Fonts, Tailwind CSS, React Datepicker
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. The site uses modern frontend technologies and has a professional design.
  5. Security headers and policies are not visibly implemented or disclosed.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML content.
  7. No social media links or external business partner domains explicitly found.
  8. Content is professional and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based frontend with Tailwind CSS for styling and Typekit for fonts, indicating a contemporary tech stack. The presence of React Datepicker suggests interactive UI components. Performance appears moderate, with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage in the provided snippet. Mobile optimization is good based on responsive meta tags and CSS. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal, with a simple title tag and no visible structured data or meta descriptions. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the HTML content. Technical debt or risks are not evident but could be better assessed with full server and header data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seekube.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seekube.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.