Skip to main content

Security report for securerpc.com

Manifold Finance Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SecureRPC, operated by Manifold Finance Inc., provides a specialized Ethereum RPC infrastructure service focused on MEV protection and enhanced transaction security. The platform targets Ethereum developers and blockchain applications, offering features such as 100% transaction protection, high performance, and global node infrastructure. The business model includes incentivizing users with cash back on protected transactions, positioning SecureRPC as a niche but competitive player in the blockchain infrastructure market. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, and employs Cloudflare Insights for analytics. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and no visible exposure of sensitive data, although explicit security headers and policies are not published. From a security posture perspective, the site demonstrates good practices but lacks formal documentation on security policies, incident response, and vulnerability disclosure. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and social media presence suggest a legitimate operation. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which could be improved to meet GDPR and other regulations. Overall, SecureRPC presents a professional and trustworthy front for its specialized service, but improvements in transparency, privacy compliance, and domain registration verification are recommended to enhance trust and security assurance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching securerpc.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SecureRPC operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on Ethereum RPC infrastructure with MEV protection. Its competitive advantage lies in offering 100% transaction protection and cash back incentives, differentiating it from standard RPC providers. The business model is service-based, targeting developers and dapps requiring secure and efficient Ethereum interactions. The company maintains an active presence on GitHub and social media, indicating engagement with the developer community. Growth potential exists in expanding global infrastructure and enhancing privacy and security features. Partnerships appear limited to social media and open-source communities, with no explicit third-party business partners identified.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, reflecting a baseline secure posture. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are critical for mature security governance. No security headers beyond HTTPS were detected, and no forms collect sensitive user data, reducing attack surface. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable risk factor, potentially indicating recent registration or privacy protection that complicates trust verification. Privacy compliance is weak, with no cookie consent or GDPR disclosures. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be significantly improved by formalizing policies and enhancing transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and establish a vulnerability disclosure program.
  4. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy.
  5. Implement cookie consent mechanisms to enhance privacy compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Manifold Finance Inc.
Description
SecureRPC offers high-performance, MEV-protected RPC infrastructure for Ethereum developers and applications. It provides secure and efficient blockchain interactions with features like MEV protection, high performance, 99.99% uptime, and global infrastructure.
Key services
MEV Protection, High Performance Ethereum RPC, Global Node Infrastructure, Cash Back on Protected Transactions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • No forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main pages.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the website.
  5. Social media links to GitHub, Twitter, and Telegram are present and appear legitimate.
  6. No forms collecting personal data detected.
  7. HTTPS is enforced with no visible security warnings.
  8. Cloudflare Insights used for analytics with minimal tracking.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. Website focuses on MEV-protected Ethereum RPC infrastructure with cash back incentives.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern tech stack including React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast load times and excellent mobile optimization. Analytics are handled via Cloudflare Insights with minimal user tracking. The site structure is clear and SEO optimized with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. The absence of forms collecting personal data reduces complexity and risk. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy features. Overall, the technical implementation supports a robust and scalable platform suitable for blockchain infrastructure services.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with securerpc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review securerpc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.