Skip to main content

Security report for secureprivacy.ai

Secure Privacy · Technology · Denmark

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Secure Privacy is a technology company specializing in providing cookie consent and privacy compliance solutions to businesses worldwide. Their platform ensures seamless adherence to GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, and over 55 other privacy laws, positioning them as a leading provider in the privacy compliance market. The company targets businesses and website owners seeking to automate and simplify their compliance obligations through a SaaS model. Founded in 2017 and based in Denmark, Secure Privacy maintains a professional and consistent brand presence with excellent content quality and user experience. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as React and Gatsby, hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. The site demonstrates fast performance, excellent mobile optimization, and good accessibility. Security best practices are observed, including HTTPS enforcement and comprehensive security headers, although DNSSEC is not enabled. The website lacks explicit security policy and incident response information, which could be improved to enhance transparency. From a security perspective, the site shows a strong posture with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. However, the absence of a vulnerability disclosure page and incident response contacts are gaps to be addressed. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations focusing on enhancing DNS security, publishing security policies, and establishing formal vulnerability disclosure and incident response channels. These improvements would further strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of secureprivacy.ai. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching secureprivacy.ai

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Secure Privacy operates in the privacy compliance technology sector, offering SaaS solutions for cookie consent management and multi-jurisdictional privacy law compliance. Their competitive advantage lies in supporting compliance with over 55 privacy laws globally, appealing to a broad market of businesses needing to meet regulatory requirements. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for their compliance platform. The company targets digital businesses and website operators, with growth indicators including a professional web presence and active social media engagement. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding compliance coverage and enhancing user trust through transparency and security improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, indicating adherence to modern web security standards. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contact information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represent compliance gaps. These omissions could impact incident handling and user trust in case of security events. The domain's DNSSEC absence is a minor risk that could be mitigated. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalizing policies and communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Pursue recognized security certifications to strengthen market trust and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Secure Privacy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Secure Privacy
Description
Provides cookie consent and privacy compliance solutions to ensure seamless adherence to GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, and over 55 privacy laws worldwide.
Key services
Cookie consent management, Privacy compliance automation, Multi-jurisdictional privacy law compliance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • Use of modern frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is rich and professionally presented.
  3. Strong focus on privacy compliance solutions.
  4. No direct phone numbers found; contact primarily via forms and email.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. Modern tech stack with React and Gatsby.
  8. SSL and security headers properly configured.
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Gatsby, ensuring fast and responsive user experiences. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with proper meta tags supporting SEO. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Performance is fast with no broken elements observed. Technical risks are minimal, though enabling DNSSEC and formalizing security documentation would reduce potential vulnerabilities. The technical infrastructure supports the business model effectively with room for incremental security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100 −1Low28 findingsView report
  2. 77/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with secureprivacy.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review secureprivacy.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.