Skip to main content

Security report for securenetwork.it

SECURE NETWORK · Technology · Italy

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in DNS health, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SECURE NETWORK is a specialized cybersecurity service provider based in Italy, offering a range of services including application security, cloud and infrastructure security, cybersecurity governance, cyber risk rating, and operation technology security. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking to enhance their cybersecurity posture. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and incorporates modern web technologies such as Smart Slider and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is well-structured with good design quality and mobile optimization, providing a professional user experience. Security measures such as HTTPS and security headers are properly implemented, indicating a solid security posture. However, the website lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as GDPR compliance mechanisms like consent banners, which are critical for legal compliance in the EU. Contact information is limited to a contact form without direct emails or phone numbers, which may affect user trust and accessibility. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional image but should enhance privacy compliance and transparency to improve trust and legal adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching securenetwork.it

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
40
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on cybersecurity services. Its business model revolves around providing consulting and security solutions to enterprises and organizations. The website content highlights key service areas such as application security, cloud security, training, governance, and cyber risk assessment, positioning SECURE NETWORK as a niche player in the cybersecurity market. The absence of direct contact details and limited trust indicators suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise with a focused market approach. The use of multilingual support (Italian and English) indicates an intent to serve both local and international clients. The company does not publicly disclose certifications or detailed business registration data on the website, which could be areas for improvement to boost credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers present, reducing common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness from a security governance perspective. The absence of cookie consent and privacy policies also poses compliance risks under GDPR. Enhancing these areas would strengthen the overall security culture and regulatory adherence. The current setup is adequate for protecting the website but could be improved to align with best practices for cybersecurity firms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, processing, and user rights to comply with GDPR.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to inform users and obtain consent for tracking technologies.
  3. Add explicit contact information for security incidents, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet recognized standards and broaden user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SECURE NETWORK
Description
SECURE NETWORK is a company focused on cybersecurity services including application security, cloud and infrastructure security, cybersecurity governance, cyber risk rating, and operation technology security.
Key services
Application Security, Cloud & Infrastructure Security, Training & Social Engineering, Cybersecurity Governance, Cyber Risk Rating, Operation Technology, Embedded & Smart Device Security
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Smart Slider 3, jQuery, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is primarily via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found in the main content.
  4. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and Smart Slider plugin.
  5. Google Analytics is used for tracking.
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data detected.
  8. Content is professional and focused on cybersecurity services.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. Lacks explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, which provides a flexible and visually appealing design. It utilizes Smart Slider 3 for interactive content presentation and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site loads with moderate performance, likely influenced by the use of multiple CSS and JavaScript resources. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta tags but could be enhanced with structured data and richer metadata. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were identified, but improvements in privacy compliance and accessibility would enhance the technical maturity of the site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with securenetwork.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review securenetwork.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.