Skip to main content

Security report for secalliance.com

Security Alliance Limited · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Security Alliance Limited is a well-established cyber threat intelligence company founded in 2007, providing bespoke CTI services globally with a focus on critical sectors such as banking, government, and critical infrastructure. The company offers a range of services including managed cyber threat intelligence, intelligence sharing, physical intelligence, consulting, and a proprietary threat intelligence portal. Their market position is strengthened by a professional team of over 35 experts and membership in the Allurity family, enhancing their credibility and reach. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and HubSpot forms for marketing and data collection. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. However, some improvements are recommended in accessibility and security headers to enhance the technical posture. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. The presence of certifications and accreditations supports their professional standing. Nonetheless, the absence of explicit security headers, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response contact details are areas for improvement. The missing WHOIS data for the domain raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, though the website content and business information appear legitimate. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front with strong business credibility but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to further solidify trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching secalliance.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Security Alliance operates in a niche market of cyber threat intelligence with a clear focus on high-value sectors such as financial services, government agencies, and critical infrastructure. Their business model revolves around delivering tailored intelligence services and facilitating trusted intelligence sharing communities. The company leverages certifications and accreditations to differentiate itself and build trust. Their partnership with Allurity indicates a strategic alliance that may provide additional resources and market access. The company targets medium to large organizations requiring advanced cyber resilience capabilities. The website content and service offerings suggest a mature business with a stable client base and a focus on quality and collaboration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. The use of third-party marketing and analytics tools introduces moderate tracking but is common in the industry. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure registration transparency and improve legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Security Alliance Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Security Alliance Limited
Description
Security Alliance is a cyber threat intelligence company formed in 2007 delivering cyber intelligence services globally, focusing on banks, central banks, financial market infrastructures, governmental and EU agencies, international organisations, and critical national infrastructure operators.
Key services
Managed Cyber Threat Intelligence, Intelligence Sharing, Physical Intelligence, Consulting, Threat Intelligence Portal
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Forms, jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow CMS and hosting
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads Remarketing
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Remarketing, ZoomInfo
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  4. Strong presence of business contact information and multiple service offerings.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and marketing/analytics tools.
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information published.
  8. Certifications and accreditations prominently displayed, enhancing trust.
  9. Social media presence on Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and marketing tools like Google Analytics and HubSpot forms. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with images optimized for various screen sizes. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and security header implementation. Hosting via Webflow CDN provides reliable uptime and delivery. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with secalliance.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review secalliance.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.