Skip to main content

Security report for sec-lab.com

Security Lab Group · Technology · Switzerland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Security Lab Group is a cybersecurity service provider based in Lugano, Switzerland, operating since 2004. The company offers a comprehensive portfolio of cybersecurity solutions including governance and compliance consulting, offensive security audits, cyber defense managed services, and e-learning training programs. Their market position is that of an established regional specialist with a focus on compliance with international standards such as ISO 27001 and regulatory frameworks like FINMA. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for consent management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise, though explicit security headers are not clearly detected. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, suggesting either privacy protection or registration issues, which impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a professional and credible front for cybersecurity services targeting business clients.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sec-lab.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses requiring cybersecurity governance, compliance, and defense services, positioning itself as a trusted advisor and managed service provider. Their business model revolves around consulting, managed security services, and training, with a focus on regulatory compliance and risk management. The presence of certifications like ISO 27001 and references to FINMA regulations indicate a strong compliance orientation. The company maintains active social media profiles on LinkedIn and Facebook, supporting brand visibility and client engagement. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data is a potential risk factor for partners and clients, warranting further due diligence. The website content and structure reflect a mature digital presence with good SEO and user experience.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect forms, indicating attention to security best practices. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response contact information is not explicitly provided, which could be improved. The domain's WHOIS data absence raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and clearer incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Add and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Investigate and resolve the WHOIS data absence to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and integrations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Security Lab Group
Description
Since 2004, Security Lab Group in Lugano offers advanced Cyber Security solutions to protect businesses, specializing in governance, compliance, offensive security, cyber defense, and e-learning.
Key services
Governance & Compliance, Offensive Security, Cyber Defense, e-Learning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Cookiebot, Finsweet FS Components, Google Fonts (Lato, Red Hat Display)
Frameworks
Webflow, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on cybersecurity services.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for an active commercial site.
  3. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or linked pages.
  5. Contact information is primarily via contact page and social media links; no direct emails or phone numbers found in the HTML snippet.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Security headers presence is unclear; HTTPS is enforced.
  9. No visible forms in the provided HTML snippet, but contact page likely contains forms.
  10. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn confirmed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies and Google services for analytics and tag management. The use of Google Fonts and Finsweet components indicates a modern and modular design approach. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Hosting is provided by Webflow, a reputable platform. Cookie consent is managed effectively with Cookiebot. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form security. No broken elements or errors were detected in the provided HTML snippet. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and accessibility could be made.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sec-lab.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sec-lab.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.