Skip to main content

Security report for seavus.com

Avenga · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Avenga is a global technology partner specializing in IT services including custom software development, AdTech and MarTech, data and AI, and managed services. With over 20 years of experience, Avenga serves a diverse range of industries such as automotive, manufacturing, retail, banking, media, telecommunications, life sciences, mobility, and logistics. The company positions itself as a trusted B2B partner offering comprehensive technology solutions to enterprises worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content tailored to business clients. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, and Piwik PRO, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA. Privacy compliance is well addressed through a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy with a user-friendly consent mechanism. However, the absence of explicit terms of service, security policy, incident response information, and direct contact details for security or data protection officers suggests areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but is mitigated by the professional website and privacy compliance. Overall, Avenga demonstrates a robust business and technical foundation with good security and privacy practices, suitable for enterprise clients.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seavus.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention seavus.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
270
Employees
26
Customers
177
Third parties
67
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-13 · 26 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for seavus.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –quarantine1.seavus.com2026-06-13
  • –adfs.seavus.com2026-05-27
  • –mail.seavus.com2026-05-27
  • –education.seavus.com2026-05-15
  • –adfs.seavus.com2026-04-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Avenga operates in the technology sector with a broad industry focus, targeting enterprises requiring IT partnerships and software solutions. Their business model is B2B, leveraging expertise in software development and managed services. The company shows strong market positioning with a global footprint and diversified service offerings. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on thought leadership and client engagement through insights and case studies. The partnership ecosystem includes career and recruitment domains, enhancing talent acquisition. The use of advanced analytics and marketing tools supports data-driven growth strategies. No direct revenue or financial data is available, but the scale and scope suggest a large enterprise. The lack of visible certifications or compliance badges may be a strategic choice or an area for future enhancement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes multiple security headers, reflecting good security hygiene. Google reCAPTCHA integration helps mitigate automated threats. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure process limits transparency and may impact trust for security-conscious clients. No direct security contact information was found, which is a common best practice for enterprise websites. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance frameworks.
  2. Implement and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure process with clear contact information.
  3. Add terms of service to clarify legal and operational terms for website users and clients.
  4. Provide direct contact details for security and data protection officers to improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Avenga
Description
Avenga is an information technology partner with more than 20 years of experience in entrepreneurship, leadership, and project delivery. They provide technology services and solutions across multiple industries.
Key services
Custom Software Development, AdTech and MarTech, Data and AI, Managed Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Leadfeeder, Piwik PRO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner with customization options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Pardot, Microsoft Clarity, Leadfeeder, Piwik PRO
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads, Microsoft Advertising, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Leadfeeder, Piwik PRO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  5. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools with extensive tracking cookies.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which may indicate privacy protection or recent domain registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end design optimized for mobile and desktop. It uses a variety of third-party scripts for analytics, marketing, and user interaction, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Leadfeeder, and Piwik PRO. The site employs Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and has a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism. Performance is moderate, with good SEO optimization and accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is mature and supports a professional digital presence, though continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to mitigate security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seavus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seavus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.