Skip to main content

Security report for seating-chart-maker.org

Seating Chart Maker · Technology

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Email security.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Seating Chart Maker is a specialized online tool designed to help event planners, educators, and wedding organizers create and manage seating arrangements efficiently. The platform offers a freemium business model where users can build layouts and import guest lists for free, with paid plans enabling saving and exporting features. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and strong mobile optimization, targeting a niche market focused on seating chart creation for various event types. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO enhancement. The site is fast, accessible, and well-optimized for search engines, although no CMS or major frameworks are explicitly detected. Hosting details are not disclosed, but the site uses HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration, ensuring secure data transmission. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS but lacks several important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. There is no visible security or incident response policy, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Privacy and cookie policies are present but do not include explicit consent mechanisms, indicating partial GDPR compliance. The site uses a third-party analytics script, which may collect user data at a moderate level. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with a high degree of professionalism and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding explicit cookie consent, and publishing security and incident response policies to strengthen compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.seating-chart-maker.org, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.seating-chart-maker.org, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@seating-chart-maker.org" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seating-chart-maker.org

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
53
Email security
72
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
100
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention seating-chart-maker.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for seating-chart-maker.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Seating Chart Maker occupies a niche market in the event planning and education sectors by providing an easy-to-use online seating chart creation tool. Its freemium SaaS model allows users to try the service for free and upgrade for additional features, targeting small to medium-sized event planners and educators. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its flexible layout editor, guest list import capabilities, and rule-based seating assignments. The company maintains a focused product ecosystem with related tools for weddings, classrooms, and floor plans, indicating a strategy of vertical specialization. The presence of structured data and SEO optimization suggests an emphasis on organic growth. However, the absence of phone contact and physical address may limit trust for some users. The business appears to be small-sized with no visible parent or subsidiary companies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth posture. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is partial, with policies present but lacking explicit cookie consent mechanisms. The use of a third-party analytics script introduces moderate user tracking, which should be disclosed clearly. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small SaaS tool but could be improved to meet higher compliance standards and user expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Review third-party analytics usage and provide detailed privacy disclosures to users.
  5. Consider adding additional contact methods such as phone or physical address to increase business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Seating Chart Maker
Description
Use our seating chart maker to build a seating arrangement from your guest list. Place tables, assign seats, and choose a paid plan to save or export.
Key services
Online seating chart creation, Guest list import and management, Automatic and manual seat assignment, Exporting and saving seating plans
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML, JSON-LD
Frameworks
Unknown (likely custom or lightweight framework)
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
wananimate.info (likely analytics or tracking)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies exist but lack explicit consent mechanisms.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found; only email contact available.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. No visible advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  7. Uses a third-party analytics/tracking script from wananimate.info.
  8. No social media links detected in the footer or header.
  9. Strong focus on user experience and mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web standards using HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It leverages JSON-LD structured data for SEO and social media integration. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. No CMS or major JavaScript frameworks are explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight frontend implementation. Performance appears fast with preloading of key assets and optimized images. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML. The site uses a third-party analytics script from wananimate.info, which should be reviewed for privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a smooth user experience with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seating-chart-maker.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seating-chart-maker.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.