Skip to main content

Security report for luclis.fr

Technology

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

97/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website luclis.fr/login is a Nextcloud login portal running version 35.0.2 of the Nextcloud software. It serves as a secure access point for users to their Nextcloud instance, a platform designed for file sharing and collaboration. The site features standard Nextcloud branding and minimal content typical of a login page, with no public privacy or cookie policies, terms of service, or contact information visible on this page. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging Vue.js and Nextcloud's core JavaScript bundles, and the site is served over HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and Content Security Policy nonce, indicating a reasonable security posture for the login interface. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact details for incident response, represents gaps in compliance and user trust facilitation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
100/ 100 · Low
GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      No privacy policy link found

      No link to a privacy notice was found on the scanned page (searched in English and the main EU languages). GDPR Art. 12 and 13 require the notice to be easy to find wherever personal data is collected.

      What to do: Link the privacy policy from the footer of every page.

Keep watching luclis.fr

This scan found 3 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
98
Email security
95
DNS health
100
Network security
100
Website hygiene
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
97

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention luclis.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for luclis.fr right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind this site appears to be a small-scale or private deployment of Nextcloud, a widely used open-source file sharing and collaboration platform. There is no explicit company information or business model detailed on the login page, and WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for such deployments. The target audience is likely existing users of the Nextcloud instance, possibly within an organization or private group. The lack of public-facing business details limits deeper market positioning or partnership analysis. The site links externally only to official Nextcloud domains, reinforcing its role as a dedicated service portal rather than a commercial storefront.

Security posture

Security measures observed include enforced HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and the use of a Content Security Policy nonce, which helps mitigate cross-site scripting risks. No security headers such as HSTS or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement. The login form is standard with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of explicit security or incident response policies and contact channels is a compliance and operational gap. No WAF or security challenge mechanisms were detected, indicating normal accessibility. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a login portal but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy accessible from the login page or main site.
  2. Implement and display a cookie policy with consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add contact information for general inquiries and security incident reporting (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers by adding HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Nextcloud - a safe home for all your data
Key services
Nextcloud file sharing and collaboration platform
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nextcloud 35.0.2, Vue.js, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy nonce present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Nextcloud login portal with standard Nextcloud branding and version 35.0.2.
  2. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on login page.
  3. No contact information or security incident contacts provided on this page.
  4. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  5. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and CSP nonce present.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  7. Content is minimal as expected for a login page; no extraneous content.
  8. Technical stack includes Vue.js and Nextcloud core JavaScript bundles.
  9. No social media or external contact links found on this page.
  10. WHOIS data is privacy protected; no registrant details available.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses Nextcloud version 35.0.2 with Vue.js as the frontend framework. The HTML and CSS are valid and modern, with responsive design considerations evident from multiple theme stylesheets for light/dark modes and accessibility preferences. JavaScript is modular and deferred for performance. No third-party advertising or tracking scripts were found, indicating a privacy-conscious setup. The site performance is likely moderate given the standard Nextcloud stack and no heavy external dependencies. Accessibility features are basic but present, such as focus-visible styles and semantic HTML elements. SEO optimization is minimal, appropriate for a login page. Hosting provider details were not discernible from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luclis.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luclis.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.