Skip to main content

Security report for seaeaglesacademy.com.au

Sea Eagles Academy · Education · Australia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sea Eagles Academy operates as an educational website focused on university-related content, leveraging WordPress with the Avada theme and Yoast SEO for content management and optimization. The site targets students and the educational community primarily in Australia, consistent with its .au domain registration. The business model centers on providing an engaging platform to highlight courses, faculty, and campus life, positioning itself as a niche educational academy presence. Technically, the website employs modern CMS infrastructure with standard SEO and analytics tools, including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies suggests gaps in compliance and user transparency. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Overall, the site is safe and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security best practices to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seaeaglesacademy.com.au

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sea Eagles Academy is positioned as a small educational entity focusing on university-related services and content. Its competitive advantage lies in leveraging a professional WordPress theme and SEO tools to attract its target audience. The business model appears to be content and service-oriented, likely relying on engagement and possibly enrollment or informational outreach. The lack of detailed business information, contact data, and certifications limits visibility into its operational scale and partnerships. The domain registration is consistent with Australian norms, supporting its local market focus. Growth indicators and partnership ecosystems are not evident from the provided data, suggesting a modest online presence primarily serving informational purposes.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces its defense-in-depth capabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No incident response or security policies are publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels introduces privacy considerations that are not mitigated by visible cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the lack of comprehensive security controls and policies suggests room for improvement to meet higher security standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  4. Publish security and incident response policies to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  5. Include clear and verified contact information to enhance business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sea Eagles Academy
Description
Build a professional university site with Avada & WordPress. Highlight courses, faculty, and campus life to attract students with custom, engaging designs.
Key services
University site building, Course highlighting, Faculty and campus life showcasing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Avada
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Avada theme and Yoast SEO plugin.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used for tracking.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. Domain is registered via a reputable Australian registrar with no privacy protection.
  7. No evidence of security or incident response policies publicly available.
  8. Content is educational and safe for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using the Avada theme, a popular and modern framework for building responsive and SEO-friendly sites. It integrates Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and uses Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user tracking and marketing analytics. The site loads external scripts asynchronously, which is good for performance. Mobile optimization appears good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. Hosting details are not explicit, but the registrar is a reputable Australian provider. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading or errors. Accessibility features are basic, and content quality is limited to basic informational text without rich business or compliance content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seaeaglesacademy.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seaeaglesacademy.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.