Skip to main content

Security report for scup.org

Society for College and University Planning (SCUP) · Education · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Society for College and University Planning (SCUP) is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to supporting higher education professionals through integrated planning strategies. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive resource hub, offering tools, events, and publications aimed at advancing sustainable planning in higher education institutions. SCUP positions itself as a key community and knowledge provider in its sector, targeting colleges, universities, and planning professionals. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and CookiePro for consent management. The site demonstrates good SEO practices, structured data usage, and moderate performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility are adequate but could be improved further. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks some advanced security headers and publicly available security policies. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the content or scripts. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common for organizations of this type. Overall, SCUP's website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence with solid privacy compliance and moderate security posture. Strategic improvements in security headers and accessibility could enhance their security and user experience further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scup.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SCUP operates as a membership and professional services organization within the education and non-profit sectors. It serves higher education institutions and professionals by providing integrated planning tools, professional development, and community engagement. The organization leverages digital channels effectively to reach its target audience, maintaining active social media profiles and a content-rich website. SCUP's market position is that of a specialized, trusted community leader in higher education planning. The business model likely includes membership fees, event registrations, and publication sales. The website's content quality and branding consistency support strong credibility and trust among its audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification but is mitigated by the professional nature of the site and its content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a non-profit educational organization but with room for enhancement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards, improving usability for all users.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing compliance with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Society for College and University Planning (SCUP)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Society for College and University Planning (SCUP)
Description
SCUP is a community of higher education professionals who, through integrated planning strategies, are building a sustainable future for higher education.
Key services
Integrated resource and budget planning tools, Professional development, Conferences and events, Publications and research
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, ElasticPress, CookiePro Consent Management, New Relic Browser monitoring
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookiePro
Marketing tools
CookiePro, Boomerang
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to higher education planning.
  3. Strong use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive.
  5. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. WHOIS data is not available, likely due to privacy protection.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Use of multiple third-party scripts for analytics and consent management.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a combination of plugins and third-party services such as ElasticPress for search, Yoast SEO for optimization, and CookiePro for consent management. It uses jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site loads scripts asynchronously to improve performance but could benefit from further optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and structured data is implemented for SEO benefits. Hosting details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and stable, supporting the organization's digital presence effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scup.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scup.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.