Skip to main content

Security report for scriptrunner.com

ScriptRunner Software GmbH · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ScriptRunner Software GmbH operates a specialized enterprise IT automation platform focused on PowerShell script automation, delegation, and compliance. The company targets IT directors, administrators, and partners, offering a comprehensive solution to streamline IT operations and enhance security. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with extensive content, customer testimonials, and integration with major ITSM platforms. However, the current SSL/TLS configuration is invalid, which poses a significant security risk for users and should be addressed promptly. Marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel are actively used with consent mechanisms in place, indicating a moderate level of user tracking balanced with privacy compliance. Overall, the business shows strong market positioning in the technology sector with a medium-sized enterprise profile and a consistent, professional online brand.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scriptrunner.com

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ScriptRunner is positioned as a key player in the IT automation software market, leveraging PowerShell to provide flexible and scalable automation solutions. Their business model focuses on enterprise customers, with over 300 clients and 100,000+ daily automations, indicating solid adoption and growth. The company emphasizes security, compliance, and integration capabilities, which are critical competitive advantages. The presence of a guided trial and extensive resource library supports customer acquisition and retention. Partnerships with ITSM platforms and a dedicated support domain enhance their ecosystem. The company’s content strategy, including blogs, cheat sheets, and use cases, supports thought leadership and customer education.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocol support, exposing users to potential interception and trust issues. While DNS records show proper SPF and DMARC configurations, the lack of HSTS and security headers reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts were found, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The use of role-based access control and audit trails is promoted in product features but not documented on the website. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with critical improvements needed in transport security and public security disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols and disable all insecure SSL/TLS versions.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  6. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize privacy and security risks.
  7. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted likely by 1&1 IONOS, using a modern front-end stack including jQuery and HubSpot integrations. Performance is slow with a large page size (~1.5MB) and high resource count (378), which may impact user experience. The site uses multiple marketing and analytics scripts, including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Sentry for error tracking. DNS configuration is solid with valid SPF and DMARC records, but SSL/TLS is not configured properly, representing a critical technical debt. The site is well structured with JSON-LD for video content and Open Graph metadata for social sharing. Opportunities exist to optimize performance, improve security configurations, and enhance accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scriptrunner.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scriptrunner.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.