Skip to main content

Security report for scitation.org

AIP Publishing · Education · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AIP Publishing is a well-established academic publisher specializing in the physical sciences, offering a broad range of peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, and books. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content targeting researchers, authors, and librarians. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and provides extensive resources and special topic collections to support the scientific community. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, consent management tools, and integrates advertising and analytics services responsibly. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly visible. Overall, the domain and website present a trustworthy and professional front for a large academic publisher.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scitation.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the education sector, focusing on scientific publishing. Its business model revolves around content dissemination through journals, books, and conference proceedings. The site’s partner ecosystem includes related domains such as publishing.aip.org and physicstoday.aip.org, indicating a network of affiliated publications. The presence of social media channels and advertising partnerships suggests active engagement and monetization strategies. The lack of direct contact information on the main site may indicate centralized customer service handled elsewhere or via partner sites. The domain’s WHOIS privacy protection is typical for organizations of this size and does not detract from legitimacy.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners compliant with GDPR, indicating attention to privacy and security regulations. However, the absence of visible security headers and a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Adzerk is managed with user consent. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented, which could be enhanced to improve trust and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response page.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Provide explicit security contact channels for reporting incidents or vulnerabilities.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AIP Publishing
Description
AIP Publishing provides current advances and foundational research covering the breadth and depth of the physical sciences. It offers peer-reviewed research, reviews, books, and proceedings from AIP Publishing and partners.
Key services
Journals, AIP Conference Proceedings, Books, Special Topic Collections
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Adzerk Ads, MathJax, Osano Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adzerk, Google Ad Manager
Tracking pixels
Adzerk tracking pixel
Marketing tools
Osano Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  4. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and consent management tools.
  5. Strong social media presence on multiple platforms.
  6. Advertising is managed via reputable ad networks with tracking transparency.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable or privacy protected, common for large organizations.
  8. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Silverchair platform, leveraging jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and MathJax for rendering scientific content. Advertising is integrated via Adzerk and Google Ad Manager, with tracking pixels managed through consent. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by third-party scripts and advertising. The technical infrastructure supports a professional publishing environment but could benefit from enhanced security headers and more transparent security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scitation.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scitation.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.