Skip to main content

Security report for scii.in

System Consultant Information India (SCII) · Technology · India

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

System Consultant Information India (SCII) is a small-sized IT services company established in 2005 as a 100% subsidiary of the Japanese firm System Consultant Co. Ltd (KSC). The company specializes in customized web-based applications, cloud computing, research and development, and business management solutions, targeting businesses seeking to blend Indian IT talent with Japanese expertise. The website presents a professional image with clear branding and a focus on quality and innovation. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance. No contact emails or phone numbers are directly visible on the homepage, which may impact user trust and engagement. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the business profile. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could enhance privacy and security features to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scii.in

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
53
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SCII operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT consulting and software development services. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique positioning as an Indian subsidiary of a long-established Japanese IT company, leveraging cross-cultural expertise. The business model centers on delivering customized solutions and consulting services primarily to corporate clients. The company showcases its portfolio and emphasizes core values such as sincerity, confidence, integrity, and innovation. Growth indicators include a stable parent company relationship and a clear service offering. The partnership ecosystem is limited publicly but includes the parent company. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital presence and improve transparency around contact and security policies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR indicators. The lack of visible contact information for security incidents reduces incident response readiness. Overall, the security culture appears basic and could benefit from formalizing policies and improving technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed privacy policy updates to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to build trust and readiness for security events.
  4. Include clear contact information (emails, phone numbers) on the website to improve user trust and support.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
System Consultant Information India (SCII)
Description
SCII develops customized web based applications using various technologies like .NET, Java and other open source platforms using different life-cycle models including traditional models to agile practices. SCII is a 100% subsidiary of System Consultant Co. Ltd (KSC) in Japan, blending Indian talent with Japanese expertise. The parent company KSC is based in Tokyo, Japan, established in 1968 with over 50 years of history in the Japanese IT market.
Key services
Research and Development, Cloud Computing, Application Development, Business Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. No privacy or cookie consent banners found
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage HTML
  4. No forms detected on homepage
  5. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics used for tracking
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  7. Basic SEO metadata present
  8. No social media links explicitly found in homepage HTML
  9. Parent company information clearly stated
  10. Content is business and technology focused
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap framework, and jQuery. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking user behavior. The site is mobile responsive with a clear navigation structure and basic SEO metadata. No CMS or advanced backend platform is detected from the HTML content. Performance is moderate with no obvious errors or broken elements. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scii.in. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scii.in.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.