Skip to main content

Security report for sciencesconf.org

Sciencesconf · Education · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sciencesconf is a French academic platform dedicated to the management of scientific conferences, workshops, and colloquia. It offers a free, comprehensive toolset for organizers to create event websites, manage communications, organize peer reviews, and track registrations. The platform is well integrated with the HAL open archive, enhancing its utility for the research community. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and targets academic organizers and researchers primarily in France. Technically, Sciencesconf is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools like Matomo, ensuring good digital maturity and privacy respect. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, though some security headers and incident response details could be improved. Overall, the platform demonstrates high trustworthiness and professionalism, supported by its affiliation with the reputable CCSD and HAL organizations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sciencesconf.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sciencesconf occupies a strong niche in academic conference management, leveraging partnerships with HAL and CCSD to provide integrated services. Its free service model targets academic institutions and researchers, supporting a large user base with over 16,000 conferences managed. The platform's multilingual support and comprehensive feature set position it competitively in the education technology sector. While revenue streams are not explicit, the backing by CCSD suggests institutional funding. The presence of detailed documentation, FAQs, and update notes indicates a mature operational model. Social media engagement on Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube supports community outreach and brand presence. Strategic partnerships with HAL and Episciences enhance its ecosystem integration.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms, with no visible exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Analytics are handled via Matomo, a privacy-respecting tool, aligning with GDPR compliance. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for academic platforms but reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding security headers and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Add incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance contact information availability, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sciencesconf
Description
Plateforme de gestion de conférences scientifiques, service gratuit destiné aux organisateurs de colloques, workshops ou rencontres scientifiques.
Key services
Conference website creation, Communication management, Peer review organization, Registration tracking
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Matomo analytics, SVG graphics, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional academic conference management platform
  2. Content is in French with English and Spanish alternatives
  3. Strong integration with academic repositories (HAL)
  4. No WHOIS data available publicly, likely privacy protected
  5. No signs of malware or phishing
  6. Good SEO and accessibility practices
  7. No explicit contact phone numbers or emails found in HTML
  8. Social media presence on Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube
  9. Uses Matomo for analytics, respecting privacy
  10. No visible security.txt or incident response info
Technical notes

Notes

The platform is built on WordPress, utilizing the Yoast SEO plugin for optimization and Matomo for analytics, indicating a modern and privacy-conscious tech stack. The site uses SVG graphics and responsive design techniques, ensuring good mobile optimization and accessibility. Performance is moderate, likely due to the complexity and content volume. The site structure is clear with multilingual support and well-organized navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the domain is under the French academic ecosystem. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and incident response mechanisms are recommended to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sciencesconf.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sciencesconf.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.