Skip to main content

Security report for schooliowp.com

Turn Digital · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website schooliowp.com is operated by Turn Digital and offers specialized website solutions tailored for schools and municipalities in Latvia. Their services focus on creating accessible, modern, and easy-to-manage websites that comply with digital accessibility regulations. The business targets educational institutions seeking to improve their online presence with user-friendly content management and analytics capabilities. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.2, uses jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics with IP anonymization, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. SEO is enhanced by the Rank Math plugin, and the site is mobile optimized with good accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which impacts compliance and user trust. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional and functional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching schooliowp.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Turn Digital positions itself as a niche provider in the education sector, focusing on accessible website solutions for schools and municipalities. Their competitive advantage lies in combining accessibility compliance with ease of content management, including mobile editing and analytics training. The business model is service-oriented, offering website creation, training, and ongoing support. The presence of a named contact and structured data enhances credibility. The company appears small-sized and localized to Latvia, with no subsidiaries or extensive partnerships identified. Growth potential exists in expanding accessibility services and educational outreach. The use of Pipedrive scheduler indicates organized client engagement. However, lack of visible privacy and security policies may limit trust among more security-conscious clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented with anonymized IP tracking in analytics, which is positive. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap. No security.txt or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site does not appear to have automated bot or WAF protections. Compliance with GDPR is uncertain due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing policies, and establishing incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Increase domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is complete and accurate to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Turn Digital
Description
Provides accessible, modern, and easy-to-manage websites tailored for schools and municipalities, focusing on digital accessibility compliance and user-friendly content management.
Key services
Accessible website solutions, Content management via mobile, Website visitor analytics, Training and educational materials on accessibility and analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Rank Math SEO plugin, WordPress 6.8.2
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Pipedrive Scheduler
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English alternate pages.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with named contact and company email.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern SEO and analytics tools.
  6. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, reducing domain trust transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform (version 6.8.2) with jQuery 3.7.1 and uses the Rank Math SEO plugin, indicating a focus on SEO best practices. Google Analytics is integrated with IP anonymization, reflecting privacy awareness. The site is mobile optimized and uses lazy loading for images, improving performance. However, no advanced JavaScript frameworks or CDN usage was detected. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. Performance is moderate, with no explicit speed metrics but optimized image loading and responsive design. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy mechanisms, which are technical debt areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but has room for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with schooliowp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review schooliowp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.