Skip to main content

Security report for scgfoundation.org

มูลนิธิเอสซีจี SCG Foundation · Education · Thailand

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The SCG Foundation website represents a well-established non-profit organization focused on educational scholarships, youth development, and public benefit projects in Thailand. The foundation is closely associated with SCG, a major Thai conglomerate, which enhances its market position and trustworthiness. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation to various programs and donation options. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain trust verification, but the website content and branding strongly indicate legitimacy. Privacy policy and terms of service are not explicitly found, which is a gap in compliance. Overall, the site is a credible digital presence for a large non-profit foundation with room for enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scgfoundation.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention scgfoundation.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for scgfoundation.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SCG Foundation operates in the education and non-profit sectors, targeting Thai youth and communities in need. Its business model revolves around scholarship programs, public health support, disaster relief, and facilitating donations. The foundation leverages its parent company SCG's brand equity to maintain a strong market position. The website's content and social media presence support engagement with donors, beneficiaries, and the public. The foundation's strategic partnerships and program diversity indicate a mature operational model with a focus on social impact. Revenue streams likely include corporate funding, donations, and grants. Growth indicators include active program updates and multi-channel outreach. The foundation's ecosystem includes official social media channels and a donation platform, enhancing its outreach and fundraising capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident, which could be improved to mitigate common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The use of popular and regularly updated plugins like Contact Form 7 and Slider Revolution suggests maintenance of security patches, though continuous monitoring is recommended. Incident response and security policy documents are not found, which could be a gap in organizational security maturity. Overall, the site is secure for general public use but could enhance defenses and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Enhance incident response readiness by providing security contact information and policies.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve WHOIS data availability or domain registration transparency to strengthen legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
มูลนิธิเอสซีจี SCG Foundation
Description
SCG เชื่อมั่นในคุณค่าของคน
Key services
Scholarships, Youth development programs, Public health support, Disaster relief, Donation facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, Slider Revolution plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, jQuery, Splide.js, Contact Form 7, TranslatePress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is primarily in Thai with English alternate available.
  3. Strong branding consistent with SCG Foundation.
  4. Multiple social media official accounts linked.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. Cookie consent implemented with OneTrust.
  7. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content.
  8. Contact form available but no explicit email or phone contact found in HTML.
  9. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2, utilizing popular plugins such as Slider Revolution for visual content, Contact Form 7 for forms, and TranslatePress for multilingual support. It uses Google Fonts, jQuery, and Splide.js for UI components. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Performance is moderate, with some heavy visual elements but generally responsive design and mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for a large non-profit organization, with opportunities for performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scgfoundation.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scgfoundation.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.