Skip to main content

Security report for scandiantech.com

Scandiantech · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scandiantech is a specialized software development company focusing on Microsoft .NET web and mobile applications, business process analysis, and enterprise architecture design. With over 20 years of experience, they serve enterprise clients by providing end-to-end software development lifecycle services including design, development, testing, deployment, and support. The company emphasizes quality, client satisfaction, and the use of modern technologies such as Docker, Kubernetes, and Azure. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS with common plugins and frameworks like Bootstrap and Revolution Slider. The site is mobile optimized and uses Google Analytics for tracking. While HTTPS is enabled, there is a lack of explicit security headers and no visible privacy or cookie policies, which indicates room for improvement in privacy compliance and security posture. Security-wise, the company mentions use of code quality and security tools like SonarQube and Snyk, and employs certified business analysts and QA specialists. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by publishing clear policies and implementing security headers. The overall risk is moderate with a professional web presence but incomplete domain registration transparency and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security policies, WHOIS transparency, and privacy disclosures are recommended to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scandiantech.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention scandiantech.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for scandiantech.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Scandiantech positions itself as a niche technology service provider with a focus on Microsoft .NET development and enterprise IT consulting. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing experience, certified staff, and comprehensive project lifecycle approach. Revenue streams likely come from custom software development contracts and consulting engagements. The target customers are enterprises requiring secure, scalable IT solutions. The company maintains partnerships with several clients showcased on the website, indicating a stable client ecosystem. Growth indicators include continuous skill updates and adoption of modern technologies. The business model is service-oriented with emphasis on quality and client satisfaction.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The company uses recognized security and quality assurance tools and certified personnel, which is positive. However, the website lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Clarify domain registration details or use a registrar that provides transparent WHOIS information.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate security risks and maintain performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Scandiantech
Description
Scandiantech provides Microsoft .NET web and mobile secure software development, business process and system analysis, enterprise architecture design, software testing, deployment, and support with over 20 years of experience.
Key services
.NET web and mobile app development, Business process and system analysis, Enterprise architecture design, Software testing, deployment, and support, SEO services for developed software
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.3.34, jQuery 1.11.3, Bootstrap, Revolution Slider, FontAwesome, Google Fonts (PT Sans, Open Sans), Contact Form 7, SonarQube (mentioned in process), Snyk (mentioned in process), Git (mentioned in process), Docker and Kubernetes (mentioned in process), Azure (mentioned in process)
Frameworks
Bootstrap, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security tools mentioned (SonarQube, Snyk)
  • Secure code repository (Git)
  • Use of Docker containers and Kubernetes for deployment

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and business-focused on software development services.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  6. Use of WordPress CMS with several plugins and standard web technologies.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking with no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. Certifications mentioned (CBAP, ISTQB) indicate professional standards.
  10. Client logos and case studies indicate established business relationships.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS platform with several standard plugins including Contact Form 7 and Revolution Slider. The tech stack includes jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile responsive and has moderate performance. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD. The site uses Google Analytics for tracking but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. The infrastructure references modern deployment technologies such as Docker, Kubernetes, and Azure in the business process descriptions, indicating a modern backend environment. Technical risks include outdated WordPress version and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scandiantech.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scandiantech.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.