Skip to main content

Security report for saskanas.lv

Daugavpils Saskaņas pamatskola · Education · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Daugavpils Saskaņas pamatskola is a small educational institution in Latvia, founded in 1989, focusing on integrated primary education with an emphasis on language acquisition and cultural integration. The website provides comprehensive information about the school, its projects, news, and contact details, targeting students, parents, and the local community. The technical infrastructure uses legacy JavaScript libraries and common web components like jQuery, Modernizr, and Swiper sliders, indicating moderate digital maturity. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility and SEO could be improved. Security posture shows some awareness with CSRF tokens but lacks critical security headers and published policies, which are important for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy assessment, but the website content aligns with a legitimate educational entity. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance its risk profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching saskanas.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates in the education sector with a niche in bilingual integration for Russian-speaking students in Latvia. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on providing primary education and participating in educational projects like Erasmus+ and eTwinning. The institution maintains a local market position with a clear target audience of students and parents in Daugavpils. The website reflects active engagement through news updates and social media presence on Facebook. There is no indication of commercial revenue streams or partnerships beyond educational programs. The school’s longevity since 1989 suggests stability, but digital presence and compliance could be modernized to support growth and community trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security practices such as the use of CSRF tokens, but lacks visible security headers and published security or privacy policies. No forms or sensitive data collection points were detected on the main page, reducing immediate risk exposure. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. Absence of HTTPS status information limits SSL configuration assessment. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating a gap in security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet modern compliance standards and protect user data effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify its presence site-wide.
  2. Add and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Update JavaScript libraries to current versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Daugavpils Saskaņas pamatskola
Description
Daugavpils Saskaņas pamatskola (former Experimental Primary School), founded in 1989 as an integrated school focused on language acquisition and dialogic communication. The school has demonstrated viability and natural integration of Russian-speaking students into the Latvian environment.
Key services
Primary education, Language acquisition programs, Extracurricular projects (e.g., Erasmus+, eTwinning), School events and traditions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Modernizr 2.6.2, Swiper slider, Lightbox, Google Fonts (Open Sans)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present in meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the school and its activities.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the main page; no data collection forms visible.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; CSRF token present indicating some security awareness.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust analysis.
  9. Website uses older JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.10.2) which may have vulnerabilities if not updated.
  10. Mobile optimization appears good with responsive navigation and slider adjustments.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery 1.10.2, Modernizr 2.6.2, Swiper sliders, and Lightbox for UI components. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate with some mobile optimization evident through responsive navigation and slider adjustments. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. The site could benefit from modernization including improved accessibility, SEO metadata, and performance tuning to enhance user experience and search visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with saskanas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review saskanas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.