Skip to main content

Security report for sareme.com

Sareme · Technology · Lithuania

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sareme operates an e-commerce platform specializing in security and automation products, including video surveillance systems, fire alarm systems, access control, home automation, and related installation materials. The website targets Lithuanian customers and offers a comprehensive product catalog along with training services. The platform is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization, supporting Lithuanian and English languages. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and the Verskis CMS, delivering moderate performance and good user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks important security headers and privacy policy documentation. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, impacting overall trust. Contact information is limited to a phone number, with no company emails or social media presence found. Overall, Sareme presents a functional and professional e-commerce presence but requires improvements in privacy, security policies, and domain legitimacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sareme.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
65
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sareme.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
5
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
40%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sareme.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sareme positions itself as a niche provider in the Lithuanian market for security and automation technology products. Its business model combines direct e-commerce sales with training services, targeting both businesses and individual customers interested in security solutions. The extensive product catalog includes well-known brands and covers multiple security sectors, indicating a broad product offering. The website's partnership with brands like Geovision and others suggests a credible supplier network. However, the lack of visible company registration details, privacy policies, and contact emails limits transparency and may affect customer confidence. The company appears to be a small-sized entity focused on regional market penetration with potential for growth through enhanced digital trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. A cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting the site's readiness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS data and unclear domain registration status further diminish trustworthiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. To improve, Sareme should implement comprehensive security headers, publish privacy and security policies, and provide clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide verified company contact emails and incident response contacts for transparency and support.
  4. Clarify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sareme
Description
Elektroninė parduotuvė specializing in security and automation systems including video surveillance, fire alarm systems, access control, home automation, perimeter protection, telecommunication systems, and installation materials.
Key services
Sales of security systems and components, Training (Mokymai), Product downloads and documentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Roboto), jQuery (implied by slick slider usage), Slick Slider, PHP (backend indicated by .php scripts)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce platform focused on security and automation products.
  2. Content is in Lithuanian with English language option available.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  5. Contact phone number is provided but no email contact found.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  8. No social media links or company emails found.
  9. Website uses HTTPS and modern frontend libraries.
  10. Navigation and product catalog are well structured and comprehensive.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Verskis CMS platform, utilizing modern frontend technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and the Slick Slider library for UI components. The site is mobile responsive and supports multiple languages (Lithuanian and English). Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected in the HTML structure. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO best practices. The backend appears to be PHP-based, but no detailed server or hosting provider information was found. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that could impact business operations and customer trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sareme.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sareme.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.