Skip to main content

Security report for sap.com

SAP · Technology · Finland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SAP is a global leader in enterprise software and technology solutions, offering a comprehensive suite of products including AI, ERP cloud applications, data analytics, and technology platforms tailored to business needs. The website targets enterprises and business teams seeking advanced technology and business transformation solutions. SAP's market position is strong, supported by extensive partner networks and a broad portfolio of services. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as SAP UI5 and Adobe Experience Manager, with a well-structured and mobile-optimized design. The use of advanced consent management and analytics tools reflects a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is robust, with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and consent mechanisms. However, incident response contact details and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms could be improved. Overall, the website presents a low risk profile with high trustworthiness and professionalism. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency on incident response and publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sap.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sap.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
65
Email security
88
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sap.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
185,085
Employees
636
Customers
178,889
Third parties
5,560
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-18 · 386 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sap.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –accounts.sap.com2026-06-18
  • –accounts.sap.com2026-06-13
  • –accounts.sap.com2026-06-13
  • –office-mfa.access-americas.sap.com2026-06-13
  • –accounts.sap.com2026-06-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SAP operates as an essential technology entity serving large enterprises worldwide. Its business model revolves around software licensing, cloud services, and partner ecosystems. The company leverages its strong brand and certifications like ISO 27001 to maintain competitive advantage. Revenue streams include software sales, cloud subscriptions, and professional services. Target customers are enterprise clients across multiple sectors, primarily in technology. Growth is supported by a broad partner network and continuous innovation in AI and cloud technologies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure channels indicates room for improvement in security transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response contact information and channels on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency on data retention and processing policies for user data.
  5. Maintain continuous monitoring and testing of security headers and SSL configurations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SAP
Description
SAP provides leading software and technology solutions tailored for business transformation, including AI, ERP cloud applications, data analytics, and technology platforms.
Key services
SAP Business Suite, Artificial Intelligence, Data and Analytics, ERP Cloud Applications, Technology Platform, Financial Management, Spend Management, Supply Chain Management, Human Capital Management, Customer Experience
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, SAP UI5, TrustArc Consent Management, Adobe Granite, JSON-LD structured data
Frameworks
SAP UI5, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
SAP Cloud Platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
6sense
Tracking pixels
Adobe Analytics, TrustArc
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch, TrustArc Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management implemented.
  3. Clear contact information with phone number and contact forms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks including SAP UI5 and Adobe Experience Manager.
  5. Strong security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
  6. No adult or questionable content detected.
  7. Extensive external linking to SAP partner and service domains.
  8. High-quality professional design and content.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query on www subdomain, not root domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technical stack including SAP UI5 and Adobe Experience Manager, ensuring modularity and scalability. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and integrates advanced consent management and analytics tools. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and extensive external integrations. Technical risks are minimal, but continuous updates and monitoring are recommended to avoid technical debt and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low23 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium3 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sap.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sap.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.