Skip to main content

Security report for saleswingsapp.com

SalesWings Lead Qualification for Salesforce · Technology · N/a

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SalesWings is a B2B SaaS company specializing in providing a lead and account insights platform integrated with Salesforce. Their solution focuses on connecting real-time behavioral data to leads and accounts, enabling sales and marketing teams to identify needs, interests, intent, and sales readiness through profiling and scoring. The company targets marketing operations teams seeking enhanced lead qualification and sales intelligence. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with SEO and marketing integrations, reflecting a mature digital presence. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership verification. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid business offering with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching saleswingsapp.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
57
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SalesWings operates in the technology sector, focusing on marketing automation and sales enablement through behavioral data analytics. Their business model is SaaS-based, targeting Salesforce users who require enhanced lead qualification tools. The company appears to be small-sized, founded around 2015, with a consistent brand presence and active social media channels. The lack of visible contact information and domain registration data suggests a need for improved trust signals. Marketing efforts leverage multiple tracking and analytics tools, indicating a data-driven approach to customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent banners compliant with GDPR, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. Multiple tracking pixels and marketing scripts are present, suggesting extensive user data collection. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no public security policy or incident response contact information, limiting transparency in security practices. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration information is a notable risk factor, potentially impacting trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced documentation and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy including incident response procedures and contact channels.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve web security.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SalesWings Lead Qualification for Salesforce
Description
Connect real-time behavioral data to leads and accounts in Salesforce. Identify needs, interests, intent and sales-readiness with profiling and scoring.
Key services
Real-time behavioral data connection, Lead and account profiling, Lead scoring, Sales readiness identification
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, OneSignal Push Notifications, jQuery, Flatpickr, Select2, Mailchimp for WP, Hero Banner Ultimate Pro, Monarch plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Segment, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Segment, Mailchimp, OneSignal Push Notifications
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain not registered, which is unusual for an active business website.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content.
  5. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are used, indicating extensive user data collection.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and SEO optimizations.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages explicitly found.
  9. Social media presence is strong with official Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Pinterest, and YouTube links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a range of plugins including Yoast SEO Premium, Mailchimp for WP, and OneSignal for push notifications. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Hotjar. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. However, no hosting provider information was identified, and no advanced frameworks beyond WordPress were detected. Accessibility features are basic, and there is room for improvement in security header implementation and explicit privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with saleswingsapp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review saleswingsapp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.