Skip to main content

Security report for salesfeed.com

SalesFeed Nederland B.V. · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SalesFeed Nederland B.V. operates a professional B2B marketing software platform focused on business recognition, lead generation, and account based marketing, primarily serving the Dutch market. The website is well designed, mobile optimized, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and marketing automation services. The company demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust signals such as a high Google Trustindex rating and a client base of over 6000 companies. However, the WHOIS data for the domain www.salesfeed.com is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency. The website implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms but lacks an explicit privacy policy page and direct company contact emails or phone numbers. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no obvious vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and explicit security and privacy documentation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of salesfeed.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching salesfeed.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SalesFeed positions itself as a pioneer in business recognition and personalization since 2010, offering SaaS solutions for B2B lead generation and marketing automation. Its business model revolves around subscription-based software services targeting B2B companies seeking to optimize sales leads and marketing campaigns. The company leverages a partner ecosystem and provides CRM enrichment and real-time personalization features. The website content and client logos indicate a medium-sized company with a strong presence in the Netherlands. The absence of WHOIS registrant data is a notable anomaly that should be investigated. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear navigation and relevant content for its target audience.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and integrates cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Security best practices such as no exposed sensitive data and use of security plugins are observed. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response information is publicly available, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. The site does not show signs of WAF blocking or security challenges, indicating stable accessibility. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy page linked from the homepage.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for improved trust and support.
  4. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SalesFeed Nederland B.V.
Description
SalesFeed provides software for business recognition, B2B lead generation, conversion optimization, and marketing intelligence. It offers reliable sales leads, real-time personalization, and Account Based Marketing campaigns, with a focus on the Dutch market.
Key services
Business recognition, Lead generation, Account Based Marketing, Website personalization, CRM enrichment, Marketing automation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, FontAwesome, Swiper.js, Slick Carousel, Tawk.to chat widget
Frameworks
Foundation Sites
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Tawk.to chat tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. Strong cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms implemented
  3. Multiple marketing and analytics integrations present
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found, only contact forms
  5. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered in public database
  6. Good branding consistency and professional design
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found
  8. No privacy policy page explicitly found but cookie policy and consent present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using modern front-end libraries such as Foundation Sites, Swiper.js, and Slick Carousel. It integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Tawk.to chat, and a marketing automation service. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA attributes and semantic HTML but could be enhanced. No critical technical vulnerabilities are evident from the HTML content. The technical infrastructure supports a professional SaaS marketing platform with room for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100 +3Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 55/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with salesfeed.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review salesfeed.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.