Skip to main content

Security report for sailer.fi

Oy Sailer Research & Development Ltd. · Technology · Finland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oy Sailer Research & Development Ltd. is a Finnish technology company specializing in delivering actionable insights through research and development services. Established in 2014, the company positions itself as a niche provider focused on data-driven consulting and innovative solutions. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging WordPress with Elementor and integrating advanced SEO and analytics tools. The company maintains active social media profiles on major platforms, enhancing their market visibility. Technically, the website is well-structured with proper use of security headers, HTTPS encryption, and cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR standards. The use of Cookiebot for cookie management and MonsterInsights for analytics indicates a commitment to privacy and data transparency, although explicit privacy and terms of service pages are currently missing. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, supporting a good user experience. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates strong fundamentals with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The WHOIS data corroborates the legitimacy of the domain registration, showing consistency between the registrant information and the website's business claims. However, the absence of a security incident response contact and vulnerability disclosure policy suggests areas for improvement. Overall, the website and business present a low-risk profile with a solid foundation in security and compliance. Strategic enhancements in privacy documentation and incident response transparency would further strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sailer.fi

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
49
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sailer operates in the technology sector with a focus on research and development, targeting business and research professionals seeking actionable insights. Their business model revolves around providing consulting and data-driven solutions, likely generating revenue through service contracts and partnerships. The company appears small but established, with a consistent brand and a clear market niche. Their digital ecosystem includes integrations with Google Ads and analytics platforms, supporting marketing and customer engagement efforts. The lack of affiliate programs or suspicious domains indicates a straightforward business approach. Social media engagement across Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram supports brand awareness and client outreach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with GDPR cookie regulations. No vulnerable libraries or exposed credentials were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or security.txt file limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The site does not expose contact channels specifically for security issues, which is a gap in incident response readiness. Overall, the security measures are solid but could benefit from enhanced documentation and communication of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page prominently linked on the website.
  2. Create and display a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  3. Implement a security.txt file and provide clear contact information for security incidents.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie and data retention policies to maintain GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ainia Solutions Oy
Registration number
0886413-7
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oy Sailer Research & Development Ltd.
Description
The Sailer approach is to bring you actionable insights and deliver them through the best possible medium.
Key services
Research & Development, Data Insights, Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, MonsterInsights
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, lfeeder.com
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie disclosures.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in main content or footer.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram with official company profiles.
  5. No exposed emails or phone numbers found in HTML content; contact likely via forms.
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  7. No signs of malware, phishing, or suspicious activity detected.
  8. Website content is professional and targeted to business/research audience.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, supported by Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for traffic analysis and marketing measurement, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Hosting appears to be managed via Gandi SAS, as indicated by the nameservers. The site demonstrates moderate performance with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and explicit privacy documentation. No critical technical debts or risks were identified in the current infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sailer.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sailer.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.