Skip to main content

Security report for safetalk.io

SafeTalk · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SafeTalk is a SaaS provider specializing in whistleblowing reporting systems designed to help companies comply with whistleblower protection laws efficiently and securely. The platform targets medium to large companies, particularly those with over 50 employees, offering secure anonymous communication and internal investigation tools. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and emphasizes legal compliance and cybersecurity. Technically, it leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and Material-UI, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools like Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and secure form handling, though security headers and explicit privacy policies are lacking. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for this business type. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in its niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching safetalk.io

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SafeTalk operates in the technology sector with a focus on compliance and whistleblower protection solutions. Its SaaS business model includes free trials and subscription plans, targeting HR and compliance officers. The company leverages partnerships with scheduling tools like Calendly and uses analytics for user insights. Customer testimonials and a focus on legal adherence provide competitive advantages. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a digital-first customer engagement approach. The multilingual site indicates an international market focus. The company maintains a professional brand image with consistent messaging and user-friendly design.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, secure form inputs, and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could improve transparency and trust. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is appropriate for the business type but reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure and incident response policy to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Consider providing direct contact information such as support emails or phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure minimal privacy impact and compliance with regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SafeTalk
Description
SafeTalk provides a whistleblowing reporting system designed to help companies comply with whistleblower protection laws, especially for companies with over 50 employees. It offers secure communication channels for employees and management to handle whistleblowing reports efficiently and legally.
Key services
Whistleblower reporting system, Secure anonymous communication, Compliance with whistleblower protection laws, Internal investigation tools, 24/7 support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Material-UI, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Leady tracking
Frameworks
Next.js, Material-UI
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with input validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Leady
Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via web form.
  5. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in main HTML content.
  6. Strong emphasis on legal compliance and security in business messaging.
  7. Multiple language options available indicating international targeting.
  8. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with Material-UI for UI components, ensuring responsive and accessible design. It uses Builder.io as a CMS for content management. Analytics and marketing integrations include Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Leady tracking pixels. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile-optimized. However, accessibility features appear basic and could be enhanced. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of visible hosting provider data limits infrastructure analysis. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for improvements in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with safetalk.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review safetalk.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.