Skip to main content

Security report for rzmv.by

Support chain, LLC · Technology · Belarus

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Размова is a specialized mobile application focused on providing inclusive communication tools for individuals with speech limitations, including children and adults. The platform offers a rich library of images and gestures to facilitate alternative communication, supporting social inclusion, education, and work. The business operates primarily in Belarus and targets a niche audience requiring augmentative and alternative communication solutions. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality, supporting its mission effectively. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Yandex.Metrika for analytics. Hosting is provided via hostfly.by, and the site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices. However, no CMS or major frameworks are detected, indicating a custom-built solution. Performance is moderate, and accessibility is basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure form submission methods. However, it lacks published privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response information, which are important for compliance and trust. The WHOIS data shows inconsistencies with a future domain creation date, which raises questions about registration legitimacy but does not directly impact the website's operational security. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional front for its social impact mission but should improve privacy compliance and security transparency to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rzmv.by

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Размова occupies a niche market in assistive communication technology, targeting users with alternative communication needs. Its competitive advantage lies in its inclusive approach, ease of use, and continuous development of communication libraries. The business model appears to be non-profit or donation-supported, focusing on social impact rather than commercial revenue. The presence of a dedicated team with defined roles and active social media engagement supports community building and growth. Partnerships with developers like yanmet.com enhance technical capabilities. Growth indicators include user testimonials and active feedback mechanisms. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding privacy and security policies to meet broader compliance standards and increase market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The use of Yandex.Metrika introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies. Incident response readiness is not evident, and no security contact channels are provided. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including a security contact email or security.txt file.
  4. Review and correct WHOIS domain registration data to ensure accuracy and improve legitimacy perception.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear data retention policies related to analytics and user data.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Support chain, LLC
Description
Размова is an innovative mobile application designed to expand communication capabilities for people using alternative languages, including children and adults with speech limitations. It provides a specially created library of images and gestures to facilitate communication, friendship, learning, and work.
Key services
Mobile application for alternative communication, Library of images and gestures, Tools for creating communication cards, passports, and books, Support and community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, Yandex.Metrika
Platforms
Web, Mobile (via app link)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission (onsubmit handler present)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex.Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex.Metrika
Marketing tools
Yandex.Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and contact form.
  4. No security or incident response policies published.
  5. WHOIS data contains suspicious future creation date, reducing trust score.
  6. Website uses Yandex.Metrika for analytics with moderate tracking.
  7. Social media presence on Instagram and YouTube is active.
  8. Website content is in Russian language and targets inclusive communication users.
  9. No CMS detected; likely custom-built site.
  10. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard web technologies and uses external resources like Google Fonts and Yandex.Metrika for analytics. Hosting is via hostfly.by, with domain DNS configured accordingly. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or major frameworks detected, indicating a custom-coded site. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Technical risks include lack of security headers and incomplete privacy compliance. Opportunities exist to modernize security posture and improve accessibility and privacy transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rzmv.by. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rzmv.by.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.