Národní pedagogický institut České republiky · Education · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.
The website rvp.cz is a professionally maintained educational portal operated by the Národní pedagogický institut České republiky, serving educators primarily in the Czech Republic. It offers a wide range of teaching materials, expert articles, webinars, and community resources aimed at improving teaching quality and supporting educators. The portal is well-established, with a domain age dating back to 2004, reflecting its longstanding presence in the educational sector. The business model is non-profit and government-affiliated, focusing on educational content and community engagement rather than commercial activities. Technically, the site employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA v3 for security. It uses a custom CMS hosted by REG-WEBGLOBE, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. The site implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR and provides clear privacy and terms of service documentation. Security best practices such as HTTPS enforcement and secure login forms with OAuth social login options are in place, though explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy could be more visible. From a security perspective, the portal demonstrates a mature posture with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The use of reCAPTCHA and cookie consent indicates attention to user privacy and bot mitigation. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response page and lack of a security.txt file suggest areas for improvement in transparency and vulnerability disclosure. Overall, rvp.cz is a trustworthy, high-quality educational resource with strong compliance and security foundations. It effectively serves its target audience of educators with relevant content and community tools. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header visibility, publishing formal security policies, and expanding accessibility features to further improve compliance and user experience.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention rvp.cz, from OffSeq Breach.
20 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rvp.cz.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with rvp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rvp.cz.