Skip to main content

Security report for rvds.lv

Rīgas Valdorfskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Valdorfskola is a municipal educational institution based in Riga, Latvia, providing accredited primary school education. The website serves as an informational portal for students, parents, and educators, reflecting a stable local market position within the education sector. The digital presence is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, incorporating modern web fonts and social media integration via Facebook SDK. The site demonstrates moderate technical maturity with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain trust assessment, but the content and structured data support legitimacy. Strategic improvements in privacy policy publication, security header implementation, and contact transparency would enhance overall trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rvds.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution operates as a public educational entity focused on primary education in Riga, targeting local families and educational stakeholders. Its business model is non-commercial, funded by municipal resources, emphasizing educational service delivery rather than revenue generation. The website's content quality and branding are consistent, supporting its role as an official school site. The lack of detailed business registration or certification information online is typical for municipal entities. The digital footprint includes social media engagement through Facebook, but no evident partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. Growth indicators are not applicable given the public sector nature. The site could benefit from enhanced transparency in contact and compliance information to strengthen stakeholder confidence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement in mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not present, limiting the institution's readiness to handle security events publicly. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from implementing best practices and transparency to align with modern compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and security incidents.
  4. Establish and disclose an incident response policy or contact channel to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Valdorfskola
Description
Rīgas Valdorfskola ir Rīgas pašvaldības dibināta izglītības iestāde, kas īsteno akreditētu pamatskolas izglītības programmu.
Key services
Accredited primary school education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Google Fonts, Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a municipal educational institution site for Rīgas Valdorfskola.
  2. Content is in Latvian language and well structured.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page HTML.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and Google Fonts.
  6. Includes Facebook SDK for social integration.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. WHOIS lookup failed due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info available.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Divi theme, leveraging Google Fonts and Facebook SDK for social integration. The HTML structure is valid and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and Open Graph data, supporting good search engine visibility. Performance is moderate, with optimized font loading and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. No advanced frameworks or platforms beyond WordPress were detected. The site does not appear to use extensive analytics or tracking beyond Facebook SDK. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential outdated components due to lack of visible update indicators.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rvds.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rvds.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.