Skip to main content

Security report for runonflux.io

InFlux Technologies · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flux, operated by InFlux Technologies, is a decentralized Web3 cloud infrastructure platform that enables developers and enterprises to build and deploy scalable applications on a globally distributed network of user-operated nodes. The platform offers a comprehensive ecosystem including FluxCloud, FluxEdge, FluxAI, and FluxNodes, targeting blockchain and Web3 developers with flexible, censorship-resistant cloud solutions. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity with a modern WordPress CMS, integration of advanced analytics, and a strong focus on developer resources and documentation. Security posture is robust with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and a bug bounty program, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent mechanisms and clear privacy and terms of service pages. Overall, Flux presents as a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound platform in the decentralized cloud market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching runonflux.io

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Flux positions itself as an innovative decentralized cloud provider leveraging blockchain technology to disrupt traditional cloud services. Its business model revolves around user-operated nodes providing compute resources, AI automation, and managed services, appealing to developers and enterprises seeking scalable and censorship-resistant infrastructure. The company maintains a strong partnership with InFlux Technologies, enhancing its enterprise service offerings. The presence of a bug bounty program and open-source repositories on GitHub indicates a commitment to security and transparency. Social media engagement across multiple platforms supports community building and marketing efforts. The platform's comprehensive documentation and developer tools suggest a focus on ease of adoption and ecosystem growth.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to mitigate automated abuse. A cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanisms supports GDPR compliance. The use of a Stop User Enumeration plugin indicates awareness of common WordPress vulnerabilities. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The active bug bounty program further strengthens the security culture. Incident response contact details and a dedicated security policy page are not present, which could enhance transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to harden security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Correct minor script loading attribute issues to ensure optimal JavaScript execution and reduce potential errors.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security communication.
  5. Maintain and promote the bug bounty program to encourage responsible disclosure and continuous security improvement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InFlux Technologies
Description
Flux is a decentralized Web3 cloud infrastructure comprised of user-operated, scalable and globally distributed computational nodes. It enables building and deploying scalable applications on a global decentralized cloud infrastructure for flexible and censorship-resistant development.
Key services
FluxCloud decentralized cloud infrastructure, FluxEdge user-provided compute resources, FluxAI private AI solutions, FluxNodes globally distributed GPU node network, Managed services, Blockchain-powered WordPress hosting, Marketplace for on-chain dApps
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Kapa.ai analytics and chatbot widget
Frameworks
WordPress theme f1-runonflux
Platforms
Web3 decentralized cloud infrastructure
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise integration
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • Bug bounty program for vulnerability reporting
  • Stop User Enumeration plugin active

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Kapa.ai
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Kapa.ai analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive Web3 decentralized cloud platform with multiple integrated services.
  2. Strong developer focus with extensive documentation and API resources.
  3. Active bug bounty program indicating proactive security posture.
  4. Good privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. Professional design and consistent branding across site.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content or domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a custom theme (f1-runonflux) and uses modern web technologies including jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The integration of advanced analytics and a custom AI chatbot widget (Kapa.ai) indicates a forward-looking technical approach. Minor technical debt is observed in malformed script attributes, which should be corrected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence aligned with the business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with runonflux.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review runonflux.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.