Skip to main content

Security report for rubikvc.com

Rubik · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rubik is a venture capital firm focused on backing elite teams building the next era of the internet, with a particular emphasis on blockchain technology. The company positions itself globally with offices in New York and Hong Kong, targeting startups and entrepreneurs in the technology and blockchain sectors. The website presents a professional and modern design built on the Webflow platform, utilizing jQuery for scripting. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. The site lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, and no security headers were detected, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Contact information is minimal, limited to a single company email and a Twitter link, with no phone numbers or physical addresses provided. Overall, the website is functional and visually appealing but requires enhancements in security, compliance, and transparency to improve trustworthiness and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rubikvc.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rubikvc.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rubikvc.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rubik operates as a specialized venture capital firm in the technology sector, focusing on blockchain innovation. Its business model revolves around investing in and supporting elite teams shaping the future internet landscape. The firm targets a global audience, with physical presence in major financial hubs. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting its market positioning. However, the lack of detailed company information, absence of regulatory compliance documents, and missing WHOIS data suggest potential risks or early-stage operation. The firm’s digital presence is limited in scope, with minimal analytics or marketing tools detected, indicating a low reliance on extensive digital marketing or tracking. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the website data.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic. The site is accessible over HTTPS (assumed due to Webflow hosting), but no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected. There are no visible forms or input fields, reducing attack surface, but also no evidence of secure data handling practices. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security issues. Overall, the site demonstrates minimal security best practices and would benefit from implementing standard security headers, compliance documentation, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with proper SSL/TLS configuration and verify with security headers such as HSTS.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rubik
Description
Rubik is a venture capital firm that backs elite teams building the next era of the internet, with a focus on blockchain technology and a global perspective. They have offices in New York and Hong Kong.
Key services
Venture capital funding, Portfolio support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information limited to a single company email in the footer.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
  5. No forms detected on the website.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies found.
  7. Website uses Webflow CMS and jQuery library.
  8. Social media presence limited to Twitter link.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond jQuery.
  10. No evidence of advertising or affiliate marketing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and includes jQuery 3.5.1 for scripting. It is hosted on Webflow's CDN infrastructure with assets served from cdn.prod.website-files.com and scripts from Cloudfront. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS with responsive design elements, providing good mobile optimization and user experience. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No analytics or tracking services are integrated, indicating minimal user tracking. Performance is moderate, typical for Webflow-hosted sites. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility attributes detected. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with improved SEO, accessibility, and analytics integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rubikvc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rubikvc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.