Skip to main content

Security report for rubic.no

RUBIC AS · Technology · Norway

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RUBIC AS operates a professional website focused on providing digital solutions tailored for sports teams, associations, and event organizers primarily in Norway. Their key offering, Rubic Sport, aims to simplify club management and event planning by consolidating necessary tools into a single platform. The company targets a niche market of organized groups requiring streamlined administrative and operational support. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates HubSpot for marketing and analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and includes modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and Font Awesome. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers, explicit privacy policies, and incident response information, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trustworthiness, though the professional presentation and social media presence support legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and credible but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rubic.no

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
65
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RUBIC AS positions itself as a specialized SaaS provider in the sports and association management sector within Norway. Their business model revolves around subscription-based digital tools that facilitate club operations and event management. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics platforms like HubSpot to enhance customer engagement. The target customers are sports clubs, non-profit associations, and event planners seeking efficient digital workflows. The website content and structured data reflect a consistent brand identity and a clear value proposition. While the company appears medium-sized, no detailed financial or founding data is available. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from the business credibility given the professional online presence and active social media engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene by enforcing HTTPS and deploying a cookie consent banner, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which limits the site's transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The integration of third-party scripts from HubSpot and Facebook introduces tracking and potential privacy risks that should be managed carefully. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly enhanced by adopting best practices in web security and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing WHOIS registrant information or justifying privacy protection clearly.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking mechanisms to ensure privacy compliance and minimize risk.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RUBIC AS
Description
Vi forenkler hverdagen. Enten du driver et idrettslag, en forening eller planlegger arrangementer, har vi de skreddersydde løsningene som forvandler din hverdag. Oppdag hvordan vi samler alt du trenger på ett sted!
Key services
Rubic Sport, Digital club management solutions, Event planning tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome 6 Pro, Bootstrap, Elementor, JetMenu, HubSpot scripts
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS detected (implied by https URL)

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing Suite, CookieYes Consent Banner
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain
  3. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and HubSpot integration
  4. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  5. Cookie consent banner present and active
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage HTML
  7. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook link
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. No explicit security policies or incident response info published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Bootstrap for responsive design. It incorporates popular libraries such as jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements. HubSpot scripts are used extensively for marketing automation, analytics, and cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance appears moderate, with potential for optimization in script loading and caching. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is current and supports the business needs effectively, though improvements in security configurations and privacy disclosures are recommended to reduce technical debt and compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rubic.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rubic.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.