Skip to main content

Security report for ruanmei.com

青岛软媒网络科技有限公司 · Technology · China

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

青岛软媒网络科技有限公司是一家成立于2006年的中国科技公司,专注于软件开发、互联网媒体和电商导购平台运营。公司旗下拥有多个成熟产品,包括软媒魔方软件工具包、IT之家科技媒体平台以及辣品电商导购平台,面向中国及中文互联网用户提供服务。网站内容丰富,设计专业,导航清晰,适合目标用户群体访问。技术栈基于Bootstrap、jQuery和动画库,整体性能适中,移动端优化良好。安全方面,网站未检测到安全头信息,WHOIS信息缺失降低了域名信任度,且缺少隐私和Cookie政策,存在合规风险。建议加强安全配置,完善隐私合规文档,并核实域名注册信息以提升整体信任度。

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ruanmei.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ruanmei.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
817
Employees
0
Customers
817
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
24%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ruanmei.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

软媒在中国科技和互联网媒体领域占有稳固地位,拥有多条产品线覆盖软件工具、媒体内容和电商导购,形成多元化业务模式。公司通过旗下平台吸引大量用户,结合广告、公关及电商合作,构建了较为完善的商业生态。其市场定位为中大型科技企业,目标客户为关注科技新闻、软件优化及电商优惠的广大中文用户。公司公开联系方式和备案信息,显示一定的正规运营水平。缺乏公开的安全和隐私政策是其潜在的合规短板。

Security posture

当前网站安全成熟度中等,未发现明显漏洞或敏感信息泄露,但缺少关键安全头和隐私合规文档,存在潜在风险。WHOIS信息缺失可能影响域名信誉,建议加强域名管理透明度。无安全事件响应或漏洞披露渠道,降低了安全事件处理能力。整体安全文化和合规意识需提升以满足现代法规要求。

Recommendations

  1. 部署并配置安全HTTP头(如Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, HSTS)以提升防护能力。
  2. 完善隐私政策和Cookie政策页面,确保符合GDPR及相关法规要求。
  3. 核实并公开域名注册信息,提升域名透明度和信任度。
  4. 建立漏洞披露和安全事件响应机制,公开联系方式以增强安全文化。
  5. 优化网站无障碍访问和SEO,提升用户体验和搜索引擎表现。

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
青岛软媒网络科技有限公司
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
青岛软媒网络科技有限公司
Description
软媒是一家位于中国青岛的科技公司,主营软件和互联网媒体平台业务。公司成立于2006年,旗下拥有多个产品和平台,包括IT之家、魔方、辣品电商导购平台等,致力于为用户提供优质的软件工具和互联网内容服务。
Key services
软件工具包(软媒魔方), 科技媒体平台(IT之家), 电商导购平台(辣品/最会买)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.4, FontAwesome 4.4.0, Animate.css 3.1.0, jQuery 2.1.4, WOW.js, Baidu Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple emails and phone numbers.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  5. Website uses older versions of Bootstrap and jQuery but remains functional.
  6. No forms detected on the main page; contact is via email and phone only.
  7. Multiple external links to related business platforms and products.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  9. Content is in Simplified Chinese targeting Chinese users.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

网站采用较为传统的前端技术栈,包括Bootstrap 3.3.4和jQuery 2.1.4,配合动画库和百度统计实现动态效果和用户行为分析。页面结构清晰,响应式设计良好,适配移动设备。未检测到现代前端框架或CMS,可能存在技术更新空间。性能表现中等,依赖外部CDN资源。缺少安全头和隐私合规脚本,存在技术和合规改进空间。
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ruanmei.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ruanmei.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.