Skip to main content

Security report for rtlg.lv

Privātā Rīgas Tehnolingvistiskā Ģimnāzija, SIA · Education · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Privātā Rīgas Tehnolingvistiskā Ģimnāzija (RTLG) is a private secondary educational institution based in Riga, Latvia, operating since 1993. It offers accredited education for grades 5 through 12, focusing on quality education and talent development. The school maintains a strong alumni network and emphasizes both academic and extracurricular achievements. The website reflects a medium-sized educational entity with consistent branding and good content quality. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor, with standard modern web technologies and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. Contact information is clearly presented, but incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, serving its educational audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rtlg.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RTLG holds a stable market position as a private educational institution in Latvia with a long operational history. Its business model centers on providing secondary education with a focus on academic excellence and extracurricular activities. The school targets students and parents seeking private schooling options in Riga. Revenue likely derives from tuition fees. The website's lack of advanced marketing or analytics tools suggests a traditional business approach. The presence of social media (Facebook) supports community engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. Growth indicators include accreditation valid until 2028 and a large alumni base continuing higher education.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No signs of vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected, but regular updates are recommended. Incident response contact information is missing, which could delay handling of security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Include incident response contact information on the website to enable timely reporting and handling of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins, themes, and core CMS components to mitigate risks from outdated software.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Privātā Rīgas Tehnolingvistiskā Ģimnāzija, SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privātā Rīgas Tehnolingvistiskā Ģimnāzija, SIA
Description
Privātā Rīgas Tehnolingvistiskā Ģimnāzija is a private educational institution in Riga, Latvia, providing quality education and talent development from grades 5 to 12. The school has been operating since 1993 and is accredited until 2028. It emphasizes academic success and extracurricular activities.
Key services
Secondary education (grades 5-12), Extracurricular activities, Accredited academic programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses WordPress with Elementor page builder.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer.
  6. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress scripts.
  8. Content is relevant to education sector and appropriate for general audiences.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Elementor page builder plugin, leveraging jQuery and standard web technologies. The site loads external resources primarily from its own domain and WordPress-related domains, with no heavy third-party analytics or advertising scripts detected. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading and responsive design features implemented. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal but includes canonical links and meta tags. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and consistent branding. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of formal privacy and security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rtlg.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rtlg.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.