Skip to main content

Security report for rrsvs.lv

Rīgas Reinholda Šmēlinga vidusskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Reinholda Šmēlinga vidusskola is a Latvian secondary educational institution providing local educational services. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and includes plugins such as Robo Gallery. The technical infrastructure is moderate with standard analytics tools like Google Analytics and Tag Manager implemented. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which are important for compliance and trust. The security posture is weak due to missing security best practices and absence of incident response information. Overall, the website is accessible and safe for general audiences but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rrsvs.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rrsvs.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rrsvs.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate rrsvs.lv and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
1
Registered
1
Resolving
1
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • rr•••.lvMediumomission

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of rrsvs.lv with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution operates in the education sector targeting students and parents in Latvia. It functions as a small local school with a straightforward business model focused on providing secondary education. The website content is basic and primarily informational. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The use of WordPress and Divi theme suggests a standard approach to digital presence without advanced customizations. The presence of Google Analytics indicates some level of user behavior tracking but lacks transparency in privacy disclosures.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. There are no detected security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, and no visible SSL/TLS configuration details in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The site uses common third-party analytics scripts which may introduce privacy concerns if not properly managed. Recommendations include implementing security headers, enforcing HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced site-wide.
  4. Publish clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Reinholda Šmēlinga vidusskola
Description
A Latvian educational institution, specifically a secondary school named after Reinholds Šmēlings, providing education services.
Key services
Secondary education, School-related information and resources
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery (custom implementation), WordPress, Divi Theme, Robo Gallery Plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Divi
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  2. Website is a WordPress site using Divi theme and Robo Gallery plugin.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts are present indicating user tracking.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. Website content is in Latvian language and targets local educational audience.
  8. No signs of adult or explicit content; content is safe for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or security blocking detected; content is accessible.
  10. Website lacks visible trust indicators such as certifications or security badges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Divi theme and Robo Gallery plugin, indicating a common and well-supported technology stack. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing purposes. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO and accessibility features. However, there is no evidence of advanced performance optimization or modern frontend frameworks. The lack of security headers and privacy compliance features represents technical debt and potential risk. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rrsvs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rrsvs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.