Royaltie · Technology
The website's security posture currently exhibits significant vulnerabilities that pose substantial risks to business operations and data integrity. Critical issues such as an invalid SSL certificate and exposure of critical services like MySQL and FTP indicate immediate threats to confidentiality and availability. High-risk exposures, including the use of self-signed certificates and open SSH services, further increase the attack surface. Medium-level issues, including lack of security headers, GDPR and NIS2 compliance failures, and incomplete email security configurations, suggest gaps in regulatory compliance and security best practices. While DNS health scores moderately well, absent DNSSEC and CAA records represent avoidable risks. Collectively, these weaknesses could lead to data breaches, loss of customer trust, regulatory penalties, and operational disruptions. Immediate remediation is essential to protect sensitive data, ensure compliance, and maintain business continuity. Proactive improvements will also bolster the organization's reputation and reduce potential financial liabilities from cyber incidents.
Scanned
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
SSL certificate is expired or not yet valid
What to do: Renew SSL certificate immediately
SSL certificate is self-signed and not trusted by browsers
What to do: Obtain certificate from trusted Certificate Authority
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 8 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention royaltie.com, from OffSeq Breach.
4 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for royaltie.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with royaltie.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review royaltie.com.