Skip to main content

Security report for royallatin.org

Royal Latin School · Education · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Royal Latin School website represents a historic coeducational state grammar school in the United Kingdom. It provides comprehensive information about the school’s academic offerings, community engagement, alumni relations, and teacher training programs. The site targets students, parents, alumni, and educators, positioning itself as a reputable educational institution with a strong community focus. The business model centers on education delivery, community support, and fundraising activities to supplement government funding. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It employs modern web technologies including Google Fonts and jQuery, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policies, reflecting a commitment to GDPR compliance. Google Analytics is present but not fully configured, indicating room for improvement in analytics deployment. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and cookie security flags. However, some standard security headers are not detected, suggesting potential enhancements. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which is common and justified for this type of institution. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid security posture with minor areas for improvement. The overall risk assessment is low, with the website appearing trustworthy and professional. Strategic recommendations include implementing missing security headers, completing analytics configuration, and maintaining regular security audits. These steps will enhance the site's security posture and compliance, supporting its mission as a trusted educational resource.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching royallatin.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Royal Latin School holds a strong market position as a historic grammar school in the UK, serving a medium-sized student body. Its competitive advantages include a well-established brand, comprehensive educational programs, and active community and alumni engagement. Revenue streams likely include government funding, fundraising campaigns, and ancillary services such as the online shop and facility lettings. The target customer segments are students and their families, educators, and alumni. Growth indicators include active outreach programs and teacher training initiatives. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processing via ParentPay and alumni networking platforms. The school’s operations reflect a mature institution with a focus on educational excellence and community involvement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie security flags set. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policies indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of several key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No exposed credentials or vulnerabilities were detected. The lack of a security policy or incident response contact information is a gap in formal security governance. Compliance with GDPR appears adequate based on visible policies. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header implementation and formalized incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Complete the configuration of Google Analytics via MonsterInsights to enable effective traffic analysis and user behavior insights.
  3. Establish and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans of WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from third-party components.
  5. Enhance user trust by adding visible trust indicators such as certifications, testimonials, or awards related to security and privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Royal Latin School
Description
Historic coeducational state grammar school
Key services
Secondary education, Sixth form education, Teacher training (SCITT), Community outreach, Alumni engagement, Online shop
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie flags set for Google Analytics (SameSite=None; Secure)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. Multiple internal and external links to educational and community resources.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and visible.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML; contact is via contact form.
  6. Google Analytics is included but not fully configured.
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure page found.
  8. WHOIS data is not available, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It leverages Google Fonts and jQuery libraries, ensuring a contemporary user experience. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The technical infrastructure is stable but could be improved by optimizing loading times and completing analytics integration. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but ongoing maintenance is recommended to keep the platform secure and performant.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with royallatin.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review royallatin.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.