Skip to main content

Security report for rotaldarzs.lv

SIA "Rotaļdārzs" · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rotaļdārzs.lv is a private kindergarten located in Riga, Latvia, offering childcare and early education services for children aged 1 to 7 years. The business emphasizes a creative, playful, and safe environment with individualized approaches tailored to different age groups. The website presents clear business information, including contact details, physical address, and company registration data, positioning itself as a local trusted childcare provider. Technically, the site is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS for secure communications. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, and no security headers are detected, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing standard security headers and publishing privacy-related documents. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the website content and business details appear consistent and legitimate. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and publishing incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rotaldarzs.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the education sector, specifically early childhood education, targeting parents in Riga seeking private kindergarten services. The business model is service-based, focusing on providing a nurturing and creative learning environment. The website reflects a small-sized enterprise with a local market focus. The company registration number is displayed, enhancing credibility. The use of Webflow indicates a modern digital presence but also suggests reliance on third-party hosting and CMS. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The business appears to maintain a straightforward operational model with direct customer engagement via phone, email, and contact forms. Growth indicators or revenue streams are not disclosed. The marketing ecosystem includes Google and Facebook tracking tools, supporting targeted outreach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The contact form uses a redirect on submission, indicating some level of form security. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which limits transparency and preparedness. Tracking scripts introduce moderate user tracking, but no explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are present, raising compliance concerns under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy publication and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
  5. Consider implementing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Rotaļdārzs"
Registration number
40203366813
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Rotaļdārzs"
Description
Privātais bērnudārzs 'Rotaļdārzs' Rīgā, Teikā, Raunas ielā 27. Piedāvā radošu un priekpilnu vidi bērniem no 1 līdz 7 gadiem ar aktīvu uzņemšanu visu gadu.
Key services
Childcare for ages 1-7, Creative and playful learning environment, Individualized approach per age group, Physical activities and sports, Visit scheduling and enrollment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, jQuery
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Secure form submission with redirect

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies via Webflow.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  6. No security policy or incident response information is published.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Website content is focused on childcare and education services in Riga, Latvia.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Tracking scripts include Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, with moderate user tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies including Google Fonts, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The hosting is provided by Webflow's CDN, ensuring reliable delivery and HTTPS support. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site lacks some security headers and privacy-related pages, which are technical debt areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rotaldarzs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rotaldarzs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.