Skip to main content

Security report for roland.com

Roland Corporation · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Roland Corporation operates a comprehensive global website showcasing its leadership in manufacturing and distributing electronic musical instruments and related audio equipment. The company targets musicians, producers, and audio professionals with a broad product portfolio including keyboards, synthesizers, guitars, percussion, and digital recording tools. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with rich multimedia content, clear navigation, and integration of modern web technologies such as Adobe Analytics and OneTrust for privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and incident response contact details could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain registration transparency but does not detract from the evident legitimacy of the brand and its digital assets. Overall, the site reflects a professional, enterprise-grade digital footprint aligned with Roland's market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roland.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention roland.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
58,822
Employees
13
Customers
58,559
Third parties
250
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-05-27 · 49 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for roland.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –adfs.roland.com2026-05-27
  • –adfs.roland.com2026-05-20
  • –roland.com2025-08-19
  • –adfs.roland.com2025-08-19
  • –www.roland.com2025-07-26

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Roland holds a strong market position as a leading manufacturer in the electronic musical instruments sector, serving a global audience of musicians and audio professionals. Its business model centers on product innovation, manufacturing, and distribution, supported by extensive online resources including product information, support, and community engagement. The company leverages partnerships and subsidiary domains for specialized content and investor relations. The digital ecosystem supports brand loyalty and customer engagement through social media and multimedia content. Growth indicators include active content updates and a vulnerability disclosure policy, signaling a commitment to security and transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent via OneTrust, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. Adobe Analytics is used for data collection with moderate user tracking. However, the site lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and does not publicly provide detailed incident response contacts or a security.txt file. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures to strengthen trust and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Provide a dedicated security or incident response page with clear contact information for vulnerability reporting.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate automated security disclosures and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance contact information availability, including verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Roland Corporation
Description
The Global website of Roland Corporation, a leading manufacturer and distributor of electronic musical instruments, including keyboards and synthesizers, guitar products, electronic percussion, digital recording equipment, amplifiers, audio processors, and multimedia products.
Key services
Manufacture and distribution of keyboards, Synthesizers, Guitar products, Electronic percussion, Digital recording equipment, Amplifiers, Audio processors, Multimedia products
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Adobe Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent, YouTube iframe API, SoundCloud Player API, Typekit Fonts, Kentico CMS
Frameworks
Kentico CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with OneTrust
  • Vulnerability Disclosure Policy published

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Analytics
Marketing tools
Adobe Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong brand presence with consistent design and messaging
  3. Comprehensive product and support information
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for a major brand domain
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  8. No signs of malware or phishing
  9. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Kentico CMS and uses a modern tech stack including JavaScript, jQuery, Adobe Analytics, and OneTrust for cookie management. It loads fonts from Typekit and integrates multimedia content from YouTube and SoundCloud. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and script management. The technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roland.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roland.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.