Skip to main content

Security report for rockfieldit.com

Rockfield IT · Technology · Ireland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rockfield IT is a small Ireland-based managed IT services provider with over 25 years of experience, offering a broad range of IT support, cloud solutions, cybersecurity, and technology consulting services to businesses globally. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for IT infrastructure management, serving organizations of various sizes with tailored solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and related plugins, showing a modern but moderately optimized infrastructure. Security posture is decent with HTTPS and 2FA plugin usage, but lacks critical security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rockfieldit.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rockfield IT operates in the competitive IT managed services market, targeting businesses needing comprehensive IT infrastructure and security solutions. Their diverse service portfolio and 25+ years of experience provide competitive advantages. The company leverages partnerships and showcases client logos to build trust. Revenue likely derives from managed services contracts, consulting, and cloud migrations. The target customers range from SMEs to larger enterprises, with a global reach. The website content and structure support a professional image, though some content areas like detailed company founding year or certifications are missing. The company appears focused on growth through technology consulting and cloud adoption services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of a 2-factor authentication plugin. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The lack of cookie consent and GDPR compliance indicators is a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rockfield IT
Description
Rockfield IT is an Ireland-based IT services company providing managed IT services, IT support, cloud solutions, technology consulting, security and infrastructure, web hosting, domain management, IoT solutions, StarLink broadband services, 3CX phone systems, cloud migrations, and data backup solutions. They serve businesses globally with tailored IT management solutions.
Key services
Managed IT Services, IT Support, Cloud Solutions & Management, Technology Consulting, Security & Infrastructure, Web Hosting & Domain Management, Internet of Things (IoT), StarLink Broadband Services, 3CX Phone Systems, Cloud Migrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Elementor 3.17.3, Elementor Pro 3.17.1, Elementskit plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper.js, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Play, Inter)
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
PHP (implied by WordPress), Apache or Nginx (not explicitly detected)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URL is https)
  • 2-factor authentication plugin (miniOrange 2FA) present
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • Use of nonce and AJAX security in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality
  2. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and email
  4. Security headers are missing or not detected, which is a security improvement area
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and themes with 2FA indicates some security awareness
  6. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious approach
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and several plugins such as Elementskit and miniOrange 2FA. The front-end includes jQuery, Swiper.js for slideshows, and Font Awesome icons. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is moderately optimized with lazy loading for images and responsive design. However, no advanced performance optimizations like CDN usage or caching headers were detected in the provided data. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO meta tags are present but could be enhanced. The technical stack is standard for small to medium IT service providers but could benefit from performance and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rockfieldit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rockfieldit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.