Skip to main content

Security report for rockerbox.com

Rockerbox · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rockerbox is a technology company specializing in unified marketing measurement solutions that combine Multi-Touch Attribution, Marketing Mix Modeling, and Incrementality Testing into a single SaaS platform. Positioned as a leader in marketing analytics, it serves large, data-driven enterprises and is part of DoubleVerify. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site leverages HubSpot CMS and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, SOC2 certification, and cookie consent mechanisms, though incident response details and vulnerability disclosures are not explicitly provided. The absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain registration transparency but does not detract significantly from the overall business credibility. Strategic recommendations include publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and enhancing incident response contact visibility to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rockerbox.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rockerbox operates in the technology sector, offering a SaaS platform that addresses complex marketing measurement challenges for enterprises. Its competitive advantage lies in unifying multiple measurement methodologies and providing a centralized data foundation with over 100 integrations. The company targets marketing professionals and large organizations seeking reliable, unbiased marketing insights. Its partnership with DoubleVerify enhances market position and credibility. The business model focuses on subscription-based software sales complemented by professional services for data onboarding and analytics support. Growth indicators include extensive client logos, case studies, and industry awards. The company maintains active social media channels and a resource-rich website to engage prospects and customers.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and SOC2 Type 2 certification indicating robust internal controls. Cookie consent and privacy policies demonstrate compliance with GDPR and US privacy laws. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the lack of a public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file and absence of explicit incident response contacts suggest areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced communication of security policies and incident handling procedures to build further trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated vulnerability disclosure or security.txt page to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG standards.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain up-to-date and detailed privacy and cookie policies with user-friendly controls.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rockerbox
Description
Rockerbox provides a unified marketing measurement platform combining Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA), Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM), and Incrementality Testing to help businesses understand and optimize marketing performance.
Key services
Multi-Touch Attribution, Marketing Mix Modeling, Incrementality Testing, Marketing Data Foundation, Marketing Analysis
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel, jQuery, CSS3 Animate It, Google Fonts, Navattic (interactive demo), Apollo.io tracker, OMAPI
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • SOC2 compliance
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Apollo.io
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Apollo.io
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive demos.
  2. Strong focus on unified marketing measurement solutions.
  3. SOC2 compliance and professional certifications prominently displayed.
  4. Multiple social media and external integrations used.
  5. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  6. WHOIS data missing, possibly due to privacy protection or domain registration issues.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including jQuery, CSS3 animations, and Google Fonts. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel, and Apollo.io for tracking and performance measurement. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility practices. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The technical infrastructure supports a professional SaaS business model but could be enhanced by further optimization and security hardening measures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rockerbox.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rockerbox.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.