Skip to main content

Security report for robohead.net

RoboHead · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RoboHead operates as a specialized project management platform tailored for in-house marketing and creative teams, positioning itself as a market leader in this niche. The website showcases a comprehensive suite of services including project requests, planning, team management, feedback, workflow automation, and reporting, aimed at enhancing productivity and collaboration. The business model is SaaS-based, targeting medium-sized organizations focused on marketing and creative workflows. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern SEO and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, reCAPTCHA integration, and no evident vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front, but the absence of WHOIS data and explicit privacy and terms policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching robohead.net

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RoboHead's market positioning as the #1 project management tool for marketing and creative teams is supported by detailed feature sets and industry-specific expertise highlighted on the website. The company emphasizes customer reviews, case studies, and downloadable resources to build credibility and attract its target audience. The SaaS model likely generates revenue through subscriptions, with a focus on medium-sized enterprises. The integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. However, the lack of visible contact information and WHOIS transparency may hinder trust for some prospects. The company appears to maintain a focused partnership ecosystem, though no explicit partner domains were identified. Growth indicators include active content updates and resource offerings aligned with industry trends.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, security headers, and anti-bot measures like reCAPTCHA. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms such as security.txt limits the site's security maturity. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by the cookie consent banner, but the missing privacy policy and terms of service pages represent compliance gaps. The current security posture is adequate for business operations but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance security posture.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance visibility of company contact information including verified emails and phone numbers.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RoboHead
Description
RoboHead is a project management solution designed specifically for in-house marketing and creative teams to get more work done in less time.
Key services
Project Requests, Project Planning, Team Management, Feedback & Reviews, Library, Workflow Automation, Reporting, Integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Olark Chat, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Olark Chat
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Olark Chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for an active business website.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  4. Privacy and terms pages are not clearly found, which may impact compliance.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  7. Multiple marketing and analytics tools are integrated.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building, supported by Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates multiple third-party scripts including Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Olark chat, and reCAPTCHA, indicating a sophisticated marketing and user engagement infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with appropriate meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Accessibility features appear adequate though not explicitly detailed. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is robust with opportunities to improve security documentation and compliance transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with robohead.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review robohead.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.