Skip to main content

Security report for roadwayai.com

Roadway AI, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Roadway AI, Inc. operates a sophisticated SaaS platform focused on AI-powered growth marketing and attribution solutions. The company targets growth marketers, marketing leaders, and data teams, offering automation, attribution, and metrics services designed to scale revenue and optimize marketing campaigns. The website reflects a strong market position with endorsements from reputable clients such as Notion and Reforge. Technically, the site leverages modern analytics tools including Segment, Google Analytics 4, Amplitude, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, hosted on a performant Webflow platform with CDN support. The presence of a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and GDPR compliance badges indicates a mature approach to privacy and data protection. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure form handling, though explicit security headers and incident response details are absent. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, warranting further verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized, supporting Roadway AI's business objectives effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roadwayai.com

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Roadway AI is positioned as a niche technology provider in the AI-driven marketing attribution space, leveraging early growth team expertise from notable tech companies. Their business model centers on SaaS subscriptions for marketing teams seeking data-driven growth insights. The company demonstrates strong customer validation through testimonials and trusted brand partnerships. Their integration ecosystem includes major marketing platforms and data warehouses, enhancing their value proposition. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a focus on digital lead capture via forms and meetings. The missing WHOIS data is a potential risk factor but does not currently undermine the company's operational credibility. Strategic partnerships with platforms like HubSpot and Notion further strengthen their market reach and service integration.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, secure form submissions, and a robust cookie consent framework via Klaro. Compliance badges for SOC 2, GDPR, and USDP indicate adherence to recognized security and privacy standards. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The domain's unclear WHOIS status is a concern for trust but does not directly impact the website's security posture. Enhancing header security and publishing clear security policies would improve overall security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing incident response procedures and vulnerability disclosure channels to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for data protection officers or security contacts to comply with privacy regulations and improve user confidence.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce risk of domain-related issues.
  5. Continue monitoring third-party scripts and analytics tools for vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with privacy and data protection standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Roadway AI, Inc.
Description
Attribution and AI Coworkers that grow revenue for you—built by early growth teams from Notion and Webflow.
Key services
AI growth marketing automation, Attribution modeling, Metrics and analytics workspace
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Segment Analytics, Google Analytics 4, Amplitude, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Meetings iframe, Typekit fonts, Webflow CMS, Klaro Consent Manager, Yes Chef Sliders, Finsweet Auto Video
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management with Klaro
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form submission uses POST with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Segment, Google Analytics 4, Amplitude, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Segment, Google Analytics 4, Amplitude, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Segment, Google Analytics 4, Amplitude, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. Strong focus on AI-driven growth marketing and attribution
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and trusted brand logos displayed
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on site
  7. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration or privacy issues
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted via AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring fast load times and global availability. It uses a modern tech stack including Segment for analytics, Google Analytics 4, Amplitude, and LinkedIn Insight Tag for comprehensive user tracking and marketing insights. Fonts are served via Adobe Typekit. The site includes advanced UI components such as sliders and auto video attributes from Yes Chef and Finsweet libraries. Cookie consent is managed by Klaro, configured for GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features like focus outlines. No broken elements or errors were detected. The technical implementation reflects a mature, modern web presence suitable for a SaaS technology company.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roadwayai.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roadwayai.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.