Skip to main content

Security report for rnbi.lv

Rīgas Ēbelmuižas pamatskola · Education · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Ēbelmuižas pamatskola is a specialized educational institution in Latvia dedicated to educating children with hearing impairments. The website serves as an informational portal for students, parents, and educators, providing access to educational programs, support services, contact details, and various resources. The site is built on WordPress and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and MediaElement.js. It is hosted securely with HTTPS enabled and loads resources from trusted external domains. However, the site lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms and security headers, which are important for GDPR compliance and security hardening. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is functional and serves its educational purpose well but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rnbi.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution operates as a public educational entity focusing on children with hearing impairments, positioning itself as a niche provider within the Latvian education sector. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting students, parents, and educators in the local community. The website content and resources indicate active engagement with cultural and educational programs, such as the Latvian School Bag initiative. The lack of commercial or advertising elements suggests a non-profit or government-funded operation. The site’s moderate size and content quality reflect a medium-sized educational organization with a stable local presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Additionally, no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were detected. Enhancing these areas would improve the institution’s security maturity and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and clearly document cookie usage to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness and build trust.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider performing a security audit and penetration test to identify and remediate potential hidden vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Ēbelmuižas pamatskola
Description
Rīgas Ēbelmuižas pamatskola is an educational institution focused on educating children with hearing impairments. The website provides information about the school, educational programs, support centers, contact details, and various resources for students, parents, and staff.
Key services
Education for children with hearing impairments, Support center services, Educational programs and activities, Information and resources for parents and students
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, MediaElement.js, Photo Gallery plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational site for children with hearing impairments.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian language.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected despite GDPR relevance.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  7. Contact information includes a phone number and an email address with the domain rnbi.lv.
  8. Site uses HTTPS and loads external resources from trusted domains.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a standard theme and uses plugins such as Photo Gallery and MediaElement.js for multimedia content. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and emojis from WordPress core resources. The HTML is well-structured with responsive design elements, supporting good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or slow-loading resources. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a medium-sized educational website but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rnbi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rnbi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.