Skip to main content

Security report for rmdatagroup.com

rmDATA GmbH · Technology · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

39/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

rmDATA GmbH is a well-established technology company specializing in intelligent software and customized services for geomatics, surveying, information systems, data management, and reality capturing. With a history spanning over 40 years, rmDATA serves clients primarily in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, offering comprehensive solutions for infrastructure and land management. The company operates a professional website powered by TYPO3 CMS, featuring rich content, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Their digital presence includes active social media channels and detailed business information, supporting a medium-sized enterprise profile. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, and FontAwesome, integrated with marketing and analytics tools including Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Google Analytics Tag Manager. Despite these strengths, the site lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which significantly impacts its security posture. Security headers are well configured, but the absence of encryption and TLS protocols is a critical vulnerability. From a security and compliance perspective, rmDATA demonstrates good privacy practices with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, including a consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, there is no visible security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure page. The WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the company's business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, rmDATA's website is professional and content-rich but requires urgent security improvements, particularly implementing HTTPS to protect user data and enhance trust. Strategic recommendations include obtaining a valid SSL certificate, enabling modern TLS protocols, and enhancing security transparency to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rmdatagroup.com

This scan found 5 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
Average
39

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rmdatagroup.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
0
Customers
10
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
60%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rmdatagroup.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

rmDATA GmbH holds a strong market position in the DACH region as a provider of specialized software and services for geomatics and infrastructure management. Their competitive advantage lies in offering integrated solutions spanning surveying, data management, and reality capturing, supported by a subsidiary focused on data utilization. The business model centers on software licensing, consulting, training, and support services targeting professional geomatics users, infrastructure operators, and municipalities. The company demonstrates growth through active customer references and participation in EU-funded projects. Their partnership ecosystem includes subsidiaries and technology providers, reinforcing their market presence and innovation capacity.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of rmDATA's website is low due to the absence of HTTPS and valid SSL certificates, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While security headers such as HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are implemented, their effectiveness is undermined without encryption. There are no indications of incident response readiness or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which limits transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies, but the lack of a dedicated security policy and contact channels for security incidents represents a gap. The overall security culture appears moderate but requires enhancement to meet industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or higher) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and provide dedicated contact channels for incident reporting.
  5. Enable DNSSEC and CAA records to strengthen domain security and prevent certificate misuse.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
rmDATA GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on TYPO3 CMS, a mature and flexible content management system, supported by common JavaScript libraries and plugins such as jQuery and Slick Carousel. The site is well-structured with SEO-optimized meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine visibility. Performance metrics are not provided, but the use of compressed CSS and JavaScript assets suggests optimization efforts. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are good, contributing to a positive user experience. However, the lack of HTTPS is a critical technical debt that must be addressed promptly to avoid security risks and potential user trust erosion.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rmdatagroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rmdatagroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.